Mailing List merge

2010-03-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Shall we merge the dev mailing lists? This should reduce the cross-posting and can be completely automated (other than you may have to update your client-side filters) and was part of the plan to merge dev efforts. I'd propose it be called lucene-solr-...@l.a.o. I can put in an issue for infr

Re: Mailing List merge

2010-03-22 Thread Ryan McKinley
why not just "d...@lucene.apache.org"? On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Shall we merge the dev mailing lists?  This should reduce the cross-posting > and can be completely automated (other than you may have to update your > client-side filters) and was part of the pl

Re: Mailing List merge

2010-03-22 Thread Ryan McKinley
Logistically, how would this work? would d...@lucene.apache.org be an alias for java-dev and solr-dev? or a whole new list? Would people need to subscribe to it, or would you already be on the list if you were on java/solr dev? If we are on both lists, do we get two copies of every message? On

Re: Mailing List merge

2010-03-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > Logistically, how would this work? > > would d...@lucene.apache.org be an alias for java-dev and solr-dev? or > a whole new list? I thought of d...@l.a.o, but we still have other dev lists under the PMC, so didn't want to imply it was the on

Re: Mailing List merge

2010-03-23 Thread Grant Ingersoll
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2567 On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Shall we merge the dev mailing lists? This should reduce the cross-posting > and can be completely automated (other than you may have to update your > client-side filters) and was part of th