t quotes) "big dog" would be
> translated into something like
> ...
> fieldA:"big dog"^5 fieldB:"big dog" fieldA:"big dog"^3 fieldC:"big dog"
>
> Having multiple pf fields allows you to query with different slop values,
> different
Hello,
I don't have Solr source code handy but is
pf3=1&
pf2=1&
valid ? What would that do ? use the df or qf fields ?
This
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
says that the value of pf2 is a multivalued list of fields ? There are not
many example abo
he.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#Field_aliasing_.2F_renaming
>
> f.my_alias.qf=actual_field
>
> f.brand.qf=brand_name
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Antoine LE FLOC'H Sent: Friday, June 6,
> 2014 5:56 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject
Hello,
I have a query like the following where "brand" is a field in my schema:
select?rows=1&start=0&sort=price+asc&q=brand:sony&qt=for-search&wt=xml
But I want to do this instead:
select?rows=1&start=0&sort=price+asc&q=brand_name:sony&qt=for-search&wt=xml
and define something like "brand_na
Thank you for this. This work around using "ie" works great.
However this is called fairly early by Solr, before the request handlers
are called. So it cannot be added be used by the solrconfig.
Anybody has an idea, how we can force "ie" all the time by simply changing
some Solr settings ?
(not c
Otis,
Can you give more details on this ? Sounds interesting to me. What about if
you are trying to re-order millions of Lucene documents ? Did you use
grouping first ?
Antoine.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've done something
Hoss,
After investigating more, here is the tomcat log herebelow. It is indeed
the same problem: "exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2,".
It is an indexing box and the comment says that we could rise this number
to 4 or something. I can do that but I have four questions though:
- is it someth
Hello,
Using "package org.apache.solr.client.solrj;"
when I do:
UpdateResponse ur = solrServer.commit(false, false);
I get sometimes (not often):
SolrException e where e.code() ==
SolrException.ErrorCode.SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE.code
When I catch this exception, I try to commit again, the call d
Chris,
My fault, the DNS changed yesterday at the hosting facility, it could not
resolve repo1.maven.org
Here is the full log herebelow
Thanks anyway
lefl@devxml1:~/tools$ cd apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/
lefl@devxml1:~/tools/apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA$ ant compile
Buildfile: /home/lefl/tools/apache-sol
Hello,
I downloaded the beta src. I did:
cd apache-solr-4.0.0-BETA/
ant get-maven-poms
ant ivy-bootstrap
And I get problems when doing this (it is working fine when compiling the
alpha): "ant generate-maven-artifacts". The output is:
jar-test-framework:
ivy-availability-check:
ivy-fail:
ivy-co
Hello all,
The page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NewSolrCloudDesign is mentioning
"Replication Factor"
It is a feature supported by Katta. Is it actually supported by SolrCloud ?
A more general question: katta had some pretty good features like this one.
Why is katta not active anymore ? Is ther
nvironment
- SOLR-2894 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894>
Implement distributed pivot
faceting<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894>
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Antoine LE FLOC'H wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I can't find anything relat
Hello,
I can't find anything related to what I would like to do: a facet.pivot but
have ranges on the second level, something like
facet.pivot=cat,price
where price is a range facet
facet.range=price&facet.range.start=0&facet.range.end=1000&facet.range.gap=10
Is it doable with Solr4 ? How did
Thank you for your answers.
Antoine.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/1/2011 8:01 AM, Antoine LE FLOC'H wrote:
>
>> Is there any difference in the way things are stored in the filterCache if
>> I do
>>
>> &(fq=field1:val1 AND
Hello,
Is there any difference in the way things are stored in the filterCache if
I do
&(fq=field1:val1 AND field2:val2)
or
&fq=field1:val&fq=field2:val2
eventhough these are logically identical ? What get stored exactly ? Also
can you point me to where in the Solr source code this processing ha
15 matches
Mail list logo