On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> I'm confused ... You're using DIH, and some of your fields are URLs to
> documents that you want to parse with Tika?
>
> Why would you need a custom Transformer?
Yeah, I can definitely vouch that DIH can handle this without
additional codi
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Bernd Fehling
wrote:
> - changed to SOLR branch_3x. Installs fine, runs fine, luke works fine but
> the extraction with /update/extract (ExtractingRequestHandler) only replies
> the metadata but not the content.
Sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:18 PM, wrote:
> The following should work on centos/redhat, don't forget to edit the paths,
> user, and java options for your environment. You can use chkconfig to add it
> to your startup.
Thanks, Colin.
Sixten
2010/5/22 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> just copy the dih-extras jar file from the nightly should be fine
Now that I've finally got a server on which to attempt to set these
things up... this turns out not to be a viable solution. The extras
jar does contain the TikaEntityProcessor class, but NOT
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, K Wong wrote:
> Okay. I've been running multicore Solr 1.4 on Tomcat 5.5/OpenJDK 6
> straight out of the centos repo and I've not had any issues. We're not
> doing anything wild and crazy with it though.
It's nice to know that the wiki's advice might be out of dat
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, K Wong wrote:
> Did you install tomcat 5.5 from an RPM?
I did not, on the advice of that same Solr wiki article that manual
installation is "recommended because distribution Tomcats are either
old or quirky." There haven't been any issues with this, except that
the
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> there is currently a bug with the apache wiki and attachments...
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2773
Glad to know it's not just me.
But does anyone have that script posted anywhere else?
Sixten
So, looking at the wiki article on setting up Solr with Tomcat
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat), there's a link to an
attached init.d script for CentOS/RedHat/Fedora. Trouble is, the wiki
won't let me access it. Even after creating an account and logging in,
clicking on the link
(http://wik
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Thomas J. Buhr
wrote:
> Basically, I need to know that issuing searches to a local index will not be
> slower than searching a hashmap or array. How different or similar will the
> performance be?
If you don't mind my asking... I'm still trying to understand wh
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Chris Harris wrote:
> Actually, rather than cherry-pick just the changes from SOLR-1358 and
> SOLR-1583 what I did was to merge in all DataImportHandler-related
> changes from between the 1.4 release up through Solr trunk r890679
> (inclusive). I'm not sure if that
2010/5/19 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> I guess it should work because Tika Entityprocessor does not use any
> new 1.4 APIs
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Sixten Otto wrote:
>> The TikaEntityProcessor class that enables DataImportHandler to
>> process business docum
Sorry to repeat this question, but I realized that it probably
belonged in its own thread:
The TikaEntityProcessor class that enables DataImportHandler to
process business documents was added after the release of Solr 1.4,
along with some other changes (like the binary DataSources) to support
it.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Some discussions/voting happened and the trunk is intended to be ...
> more like a normal trunk.
>
> If you need features not in an official release, and are looking for a
> codebase with updated features, I would recommend instead considering
I've been investigating Solr on and off as a (or even the) search
solution for my employer's content management solution. One of the
biggest questions in my mind at this point is which version to go
with. In general, 1.4 would seem the obvious choice, as it's the only
released version on that list.
14 matches
Mail list logo
