: so when i do a debug this is the parsedquery_tostring i see:
: (((text:divorc^0.8 | name:divorc^2.0)~0.01 (text:mediat^0.8 |
: name:mediat^2.0)~0.01)~2) (text:"(divorc altern) (disput mediat)
: resolut"~5^0.8 | name:"(divorc altern) (disput mediat) resolut"~5^2.0)~0.01
FYI: it's very hard to mak
hossman wrote:
>
> This is "Issue #1" regarding trying to use query time multi word synonyms
> discussed on the wiki...
>
>>> "The Lucene QueryParser tokenizes on white space before giving any
>>> text to the Analyzer, so if a person searches for the words sea biscit
>>> the analyzer will be
Chris,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : I have the synonym filter only at query time coz i can't re-index data (or
> : portion of data) everytime i add a synonym and a couple of other reasons.
>
> Use cases like yours will *never* work as a query time
swarag wrote:
>
> Knowing the Lucene struggles with multi-word query-time synonyms, my
> question is, does this also affect index-time synonyms? What other
> alternatives do we have if we require there to be multiple word synonyms?
>
No the multiple word problem doesn't happen with index synon
matt connolly wrote:
>
>
> swarag wrote:
>>
>> Knowing the Lucene struggles with multi-word query-time synonyms, my
>> question is, does this also affect index-time synonyms? What other
>> alternatives do we have if we require there to be multiple word synonyms?
>>
>
> No the multiple word p
You won't have the multiple word problem if you use synonyms at index time
instead of query time.
swarag wrote:
>
> Here is a basic example of some synonyms in my synonyms.txt:
> club=>club,bar,night cabaret
> bar=>bar,club
>
> As you can see, a search for 'bar' will return any documents with
matt connolly wrote:
>
> You won't have the multiple word problem if you use synonyms at index time
> instead of query time.
>
>
> swarag wrote:
>>
>> Here is a basic example of some synonyms in my synonyms.txt:
>> club=>club,bar,night cabaret
>> bar=>bar,club
>>
>> As you can see, a search
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:27 PM, swarag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To my understanding, this means I am using synonyms at index time and NOT
> query time. And yet, I am still having these problems with synonyms.
Can you give a specific example? Use debugQuery=true to see what the
resulting quer
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:27 PM, swarag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> To my understanding, this means I am using synonyms at index time and NOT
>> query time. And yet, I am still having these problems with synonyms.
>
> Can you give a specific example? Use debugQuery=
swarag wrote:
>
>
> Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:27 PM, swarag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> To my understanding, this means I am using synonyms at index time and
>>> NOT
>>> query time. And yet, I am still having these problems with synonyms.
>>
>> Can you give a s
en if I dont believe to.. Fact is this
approach have fixed your problem, since we didn't what synonym matching if
the user only types part of synonymic expression.
Regards,
Laurent
-Message d'origine-
De : swarag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 25 juillet 2008 23:48
À
Hi Laurent
Laurent Gilles wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was faced with the same issues reguarding multiwords synonyms
> Let's say a synonyms list like:
>
> club, bar, night cabaret
>
> Now if we have a document containing "club", with the default synonyms
> filter behaviour with expand=true, we will
full-text-stemmed field type.
Here was our need and solution, hope this can help you to find a solution
for you.
Regards,
Laurent
-Message d'origine-
De : swarag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 29 juillet 2008 04:08
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : RE: solr synonyms beh
13 matches
Mail list logo
