2.2686384476181933E-4
15
16712
8.975586404978459E-4
Plus, of course, I'm curious to know exactly how MLT is identifying those
terms as important, and if it's a bug or my fault...
Thanks for your help though! Do any of the Solr devs have an idea of the
mechanism at work here?
Andr
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Selection-of-terms-for-MoreLikeThis-tp26286005p26336558.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Selection-of-terms-for-MoreLikeThis-tp26286005p26336558.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
it wrong?
BTW the keywords field is indexed, stored, multi-valued and term-vectored.
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
:: http://biotext.org.uk/ ::
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Selection-of-terms-for-MoreLikeThis-tp26286005p26335061.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
a far better
> candidate for a MoreLikeThis query than something with tf.idf = 1.46E-4?
> Or does MoreLikeThis do some other heuristic magic to select good
> candidates, and sometimes get it wrong?
>
> BTW the keywords field is indexed, stored, multi-valued and term-vect
ry than something with tf.idf = 1.46E-4? Or
does MoreLikeThis do some other heuristic magic to select good candidates,
and sometimes get it wrong?
BTW the keywords field is indexed, stored, multi-valued and term-vectored.
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
:: http://biotext.org.uk/ ::
--
View this mes
