Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
t; -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message- From: Ramkumar R. Aiyengar > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:03 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr limitations > > > I understand, thanks. I just wanted to check in case there were scalability > limitations wit

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-10 Thread Lance Norskog
s and you should do okay. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 9:46 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr limitations Hello everyone, I am trying to search information about possible solr limitations I should conside

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-10 Thread Jack Krupansky
4-node cluster will perform really well, nor to imply that a 96-node or 128-node cluster won't perform well. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Ramkumar R. Aiyengar Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:03 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr limitations I under

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-10 Thread Ramkumar R. Aiyengar
rameter, where field names > > are expected to adhere to Java naming rules. When people start "going > wild" > > with dynamic fields, it is common that they start "going wild" with their > > names as well, using spaces, colons, slashes, etc. that cannot be

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-09 Thread Erick Erickson
r > names as well, using spaces, colons, slashes, etc. that cannot be parsed in > the "fl" and "qf" parameters, for example. Please don't go there! >> >> In short, put up a small cluster and start doing a Proof of Concept > cluster. Stay within my suggested gu

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-09 Thread Ramkumar R. Aiyengar
luster and start doing a Proof of Concept cluster. Stay within my suggested guidelines and you should do okay. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 9:46 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Solr

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-08 Thread Jack Krupansky
ent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:43 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr limitations Jack, Thanks a lot for your answers. I guess I just had heard on Cassandra Summit that Solr can't support more than 1024 dynamic fields and it might be possible in my case, that's why I aske

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-08 Thread Marcelo Elias Del Valle
t "going wild" > with dynamic fields, it is common that they start "going wild" with their > names as well, using spaces, colons, slashes, etc. that cannot be parsed in > the "fl" and "qf" parameters, for example. Please don't go there! > >

Re: Solr limitations

2013-07-08 Thread Jack Krupansky
eters, for example. Please don't go there! In short, put up a small cluster and start doing a Proof of Concept cluster. Stay within my suggested guidelines and you should do okay. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 9

Solr limitations

2013-07-08 Thread Marcelo Elias Del Valle
Hello everyone, I am trying to search information about possible solr limitations I should consider in my architecture. Things like max number of dynamic fields, max number o documents in SolrCloud, etc. Does anyone know where I can find this info? Best regards, -- Marcelo Elias Del