On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:54:52PM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
XXX Someone else can decide whether we should refer to U.S.A. or to
XXX the United States in the parenthetical.
The way it is now matches the other use later on, so let's leave it.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:29:34AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Yes. The trouble is that because libraries and headers don't match up,
you need to parse headers to extract the lists, and that seems likely
to end up being delicate and a constant source of annoyance.
How about the
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:51:46PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
A transfer of little-endian data? I guess that's not entirely clear,
especially for anyone who doesn't automatically interpret DMA as a
form of memcpy.
Anyway, I just fixed it up again, please take a look.
to
to handle PCI bus master devices that (via DMA) transfer word parameters
in little endian even on big endian systems.
Still sounds pretty awkward.
Well, the definition of endianness itself is always awkward.
What about little endian control data instead of juts little endian
data?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 03:53:42PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Sat May 15 15:53:42 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man5: veriexec.5
Log Message:
Minor markup improvements.
The version before your change was how .An was
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:22:39PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/games/factor: factor.6 factor.c
Log Message:
Follow the Fundamental Theory of Algebra. Disallow factorising of
numbers less than 2 as it is not
- naturally unique (negative numbers)
-
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:44:34PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:22:39PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/games/factor: factor.6 factor.c
Log Message:
Follow the Fundamental Theory of Algebra. Disallow factorising of
numbers less
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:46:16PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Discussed with the kristaps and wiz
Did you bother to read tech-userlevel before doing this?
Yes and it was quite interesting.
so you blithely ignored the conclusion?
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org