Hello,
I've committed a couple more changes to the SELinux policy modules
I've been working on, and they seem to give reasonable results now.
You are welcome to change Permissive to Enforcing and give Spacewalk
with SELinux a try.
Some quotes from
https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Hello,
I've committed a couple more changes to the SELinux policy modules
I've been working on, and they seem to give reasonable results now.
You are welcome to change Permissive to Enforcing and give Spacewalk
with SELinux a try.
Some quotes from
https://fedorahosted.org
Mike McCune wrote:
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Hello,
I've committed a couple more changes to the SELinux policy modules
I've been working on, and they seem to give reasonable results now.
You are welcome to change Permissive to Enforcing and give Spacewalk
with SELinux a try.
Some quotes from
http
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:39:02PM -0800, Mike McCune wrote:
> Mike McCune wrote:
>> Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've committed a couple more changes to the SELinux policy modules
>>> I've been working on, and they seem to give reasonable results now.
>>> You are welcome to change Permi
I don't have selinux on. Is this expected? it took almost 10 minutes
and I eventually just CTRL+C-ed it.
Well yes, we run restorecon on /var/satellite to set correct context,
even if you are not in Enforcing. It is not expected to fail thou.
Also calling restorecon with selinux dis
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:39:02PM -0800, Mike McCune wrote:
Mike McCune wrote:
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Hello,
I've committed a couple more changes to the SELinux policy modules
I've been working on, and they seem to give reasonable results now.
You are welcome to change Per
Well, we could check sestatus for disabled.
FWIW, a bit easier: /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled returns 0 if enabled.
Just found out about that recently :)
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:28:17PM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
>> Well yes, we run restorecon on /var/satellite to set correct context,
>> even if you are not in Enforcing. It is not expected to fail thou.
>
> Also calling restorecon with selinux disabled probably won't work.
Well, we co
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 02:43:49 pm Michael DeHaan wrote:
> > Well, we could check sestatus for disabled.
>
> FWIW, a bit easier: /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled returns 0 if enabled.
>
> Just found out about that recently :)
or /usr/sbin/getenforce will tell you if its in enforcing, permissive or
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 02:43:49 pm Michael DeHaan wrote:
Well, we could check sestatus for disabled.
FWIW, a bit easier: /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled returns 0 if enabled.
Just found out about that recently :)
or /usr/sbin/getenforce will tell you if i
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:39:37PM -0800, Mike McCune wrote:
> Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>> So I'm testing the latest spacewalk-setup on a box that already had a
>>> manually upgraded 0.4 on it and got pages and pages of:
>>>
>>> /sbin/restorecon set context
>>> /var/satellite/redhat/1/f34/gnumeri
11 matches
Mail list logo
