gt; =Drummond
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Hardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:21 PM
> To: Drummond Reed
> Cc: 'Josh Hoyt'; specs@openid.net
> Subject: Re: Delegation Proposal Amendment
>
> Drummond
>
> How does the
ROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:21 PM
To: Drummond Reed
Cc: 'Josh Hoyt'; specs@openid.net
Subject: Re: Delegation Proposal Amendment
Drummond
How does the RP get a persistent identifier before it has called the
IdP? The user could type anything into the form.
-- Dick
On 6-Oct
> openid.rp_user_id.
> (And by your amendment, if RP does not send openid.rp_user_id, then it
> defaults to openid.identity).
>
> 2) If the RP prompts the User for a Display Name for an OpenID
> identifier,
> the RP SHOULD set the value of openid.display to the UTF-8 encoded
> Do you mean literal Unix-style diffs or a human-readable set
> of changes to section numbers?
I'd personally prefer the former, but I would settle for the
latter.
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Josh Hoyt
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:41 AM
To: specs@openid.net
Subject: Delegation Proposal Amendment
I'd like to amend my proposal for changing the delegation mechanism:
Revised Proposal
As it stands, "openid.identity&quo
On 10/6/06, Granqvist, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you propose this in terms of diffs to the current draft so
> it is glaringly obvious what the proposal means?
Sure.
> Also, I think this "diffs to current draft" can be most useful
> for all proposals as it cuts through the various sema
> ...
> Revised Proposal
>
>
> As it stands, "openid.identity" is the identifier by which
> the IdP knows the user. There is no parameter by which the RP
> knows the user.
>
> I propose to add a field called "openid.rp_user_id" in
> "checkid_*" and "id_res" that defaults to "o
I'd like to amend my proposal for changing the delegation mechanism:
Revised Proposal
As it stands, "openid.identity" is the identifier by which the IdP
knows the user. There is no parameter by which the RP knows the user.
I propose to add a field called "openid.rp_user_id" in "