[sqlalchemy] Re: Ordered merge of shard results (update)

2008-05-05 Thread Kyle Schaffrick
On Sat, 3 May 2008 07:03:56 -0400 Kyle Schaffrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in the process now of rebasing against user_defined_state. I just got done uploading the rebased series. That little rowtuple change turned out to be the biggest headache to adapt to :) In any

[sqlalchemy] Re: Ordered merge of shard results (update)

2008-05-03 Thread Michael Bayer
On May 3, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Kyle Schaffrick wrote: The one thing I haven't checked yet is if inheritance breaks the meth = _generative(__foo_condition)(meth) call, since it's not clear to me that the __foo_condition names are bound inside ShardedQuery's definition. I haven't

[sqlalchemy] Re: Ordered merge of shard results (update)

2008-05-01 Thread Michael Bayer
On May 1, 2008, at 5:24 AM, Kyle Schaffrick wrote: There are two versions of its implementation, one based on the other. The original one tries to find mapper properties on the instances or column entities that match the expressions given. The upside is that it doesn't alter the