fts3_write.c line 1241 calls sqlite3Fts3Corrupt but function is only defined if
SQLITE_DEBUG is defined when fts3.c is compiled.
--
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
I felt it was time to change the subject line to something more useful.
Also everything works flawlessly here on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 :
.
.
.
SQLite 2019-11-25 04:15:33
b0b655625cf491c832a259d29a67660b8d5943c201617900a83d0660b2673377
0 errors out of 250197 tests on boe13.genunix.com
The result of datetime(0, 'unixepoch') is '1970-01-01 00:00:00'. This is what
does not have milliseconds (the output). It is a text string in the format
-MM-DD HH:MM:SS. Similarly datetime(0.123, 'unixepoch') is also
'1970-01-01 00:00:00'.
The result of datetime(0) is, of course,
On 25 Nov 2019, at 11:02am, Jaroslav Homisin wrote:
> I have expected a list of the two constraints: of Primary key and of Unique.
> But I can find only Primary Key Constraint.
Where are you getting your list of constraints from ?
SQLite version 3.28.0 2019-04-15 14:49:49
Enter ".help" for
Thanks for clarifying this, David. Learned something new today!
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 15:25, David Raymond
wrote:
> There'll be a few differences.
>
> The JOIN version will return 1 row for every item in queries which
> matches, and it will test every single one every time. So if you have in
>
the type of CreationDate is integer.
The CreationDate is inserted with strftime('%s', '1970-01-01 00:00:00.000')
need to check which value is written to the database.
I also tried without milliseconds - same result.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users
This is FireDAC error message not SQLite specific. I cannot reproduce it
when
using default FireDAC settings. But I think you must check Database
ResourceOptions
CmdExecMode. Change to am_NonBlocking. But I do not have to change that
by default.
Regards Radovan
On 25.11.2019 18:34, Edson
Hi everyone!
I am using SQLite, with Delphi XE Rio and Firedac and I don't know why, a
cited error message appeared.
I've tried everything to unlock the database: I renamed the .db file,
changed the folder file, turned off the notebook, etc.,
but I can't unlock the .db database.
The error
Dear SQLite support,
Develop informations:
Windows 7 64bit
Visual StudioProfessional 2015 (Version 14.0.25431.01 Update 3);
.NET Build Platform 4.5.1
System.Data.SQLite.dll used from Installation
sqlite-netFx451-setup-bundle-x64-2013-1.0.112.0.exe
--
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
On Sunday, 24 November, 2019 13:21, Dominik Ohnezeit
wrote:
>I am trying to convert a date to timestamp, but after the conversion with
>strftime('%s') the integer result
This is FireDAC error message not SQLite specific. I cannot reproduce it
when
using default FireDAC settings. But I think you must check Database
ResourceOptions
CmdExecMode. Change to am_NonBlocking. But I do not have to change that
by default.
Regards Radovan
On 25.11.2019 18:34, Edson
It would be my pleasure to get some light tossed on this ... so here is
a very clean compile ( no -std in CFLAGS at all on gcc 9.2.0 ) and the
tests look like so :
This is a test script error. Should now be fixed here:
https://sqlite.org/src/info/b0b655625cf491c8
What version of Tcl are you
Hi everyone!
I am using SQLite, with Delphi XE Rio and Firedac and I don't know why, a
cited error message appeared.
I've tried everything to unlock the database: I renamed the .db file,
changed the folder file, turned off the notebook, etc.,
but I can't unlock the .db database.
The error
On 11/25/19, OBones wrote:
> Maybe I'm completely wrong, but using t0 both as the name of the virtual
> table and the source for its content seems to me like the perfect
> condition to create a infinite recursion.
You are exactly correct in diagnosing the problem. This is an attack
that we
林性伟(林以) wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to make you inconvenient.
poc, test.sql:
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE t0 USING fts4(content=t0,0);
SELECT count() FROM t0(0);
Maybe I'm completely wrong, but using t0 both as the name of the virtual
table and the source for its content seems to me like the perfect
condition
Dr Hipp replied to this 2 days ago with this:
Documentation fix https://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/info/a2762f031964e774
will appears in the next release.
".header" is an abbreviation for ".headers" and does exactly the same thing.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users On Behalf Of
John
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:42 AM Craig Maynard wrote:
> All,
>
> Could someone clarify the difference between the two sqlite3 shell
> commands .header and .headers?
>
> The relevant documentation page: https://www.sqlite.org/cli.html
>
> On the cli page, .header is discussed in section 5 but does
All,
Could someone clarify the difference between the two sqlite3 shell commands
.header and .headers?
The relevant documentation page: https://www.sqlite.org/cli.html
On the cli page, .header is discussed in section 5 but does not appear in
Section 3.
Thanks,
Craig
--
Craig H Maynard
There'll be a few differences.
The JOIN version will return 1 row for every item in queries which matches, and
it will test every single one every time. So if you have in the queries table
both 'Alex' and 'Alexand' then 'Alexander' and 'Alexandra' will each show up
twice, once for 'Alex' and
Dominik Ohnezeit, on Sunday, November 24, 2019 03:21 PM, wrote...
> strftime('%s', '1970-01-01 00:00:00.000')
[clip]
> the date I get back is not 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000 but 1969-12-31
> 22:29:11.000
>
> Does anyone know why?
Here are some samples run...
sqlite> select strftime('%s',
On 11/24/19, Dominik Ohnezeit wrote:
>
> strftime('%s', '1970-01-01 00:00:00.000')
Returns '0'.
>
> datetime(CreationDate, 'unixepoch')
Assuming CreationDate is 0, this returns '1970-01-01 00:00:00'.
>
> Does anyone know why?
>
Dunno why you might be getting anything different.
--
D.
Hello,
I am trying to convert a date to timestamp, but after the conversion with
strftime('%s') the integer result is wrong
Example:
I insert a integer timestamp into a integer table column named CreationDate
with
strftime('%s', '1970-01-01 00:00:00.000')
After getting it from
With recent versions of sqlite3 (not seen with OSX Mojave 10.14.6 stock SQLite
version 3.16.2 or before), a convenient function edit() was introduced. However
it is not disabled for batch mode where it is never intended.
For batch mode it is preferable to keep backward compatible behavior to
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 4:17 PM Dan Kennedy wrote:
> > [...] Why is thread_B blocked when doing a read just because SQLite is
> writing to another table? [...]
> > Is this the expected behavior or am I doing something stupid in my code.
> And if so, what to check?
>
> This should only happen if
24 matches
Mail list logo
