On 2012/04/08 Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> On 2011/10/23, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>>> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> When WHERE condition is constant, there are no need to evaluate and check
> it for
> each row. It works, but only partially:
>
On 2011/10/23, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>>> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
When WHERE condition is constant, there are no need to evaluate and check
it for
each row. It works, but only partially:
>>> ...
[In fact, you can move out out lo
Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>>> When WHERE condition is constant, there are no need to evaluate and check
>>> it for
>>> each row. It works, but only partially:
>> ...
>>> [In fact, you can move out out loop not only *whole* constant WHERE, but
>>> al
Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
>> When WHERE condition is constant, there are no need to evaluate and check it
>> for
>> each row. It works, but only partially:
> ...
>> [In fact, you can move out out loop not only *whole* constant WHERE, but also
>> all constant AND terms of WHER
Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> When WHERE condition is constant, there are no need to evaluate and check it
> for
> each row. It works, but only partially:
...
> [In fact, you can move out out loop not only *whole* constant WHERE, but also
> all constant AND terms of WHERE, like this:
> SELECT * FROM t
5 matches
Mail list logo