Re: squid-smp: synchronization issue & solutions

2009-11-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
Right. Thats the easy bit. I could even do that in Squid-2 with a little bit of luck. The hard bit is rewriting the relevant code which relies on cbdata style reference counting behaviour. That is the tricky bit. Adrian 2009/11/20 Robert Collins : > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:46 +0800, Adrian Cha

Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-FreeBSD-7.2 #30

2009-11-19 Thread noc
See Changes: [Automatic source maintenance ] SourceFormat Enforcement [Amos Jeffries ] Send correct Connection: header on intercepted replies Intercepted apps are expecting Connection: back from the server not our default Pro

Re: squid-smp: synchronization issue & solutions

2009-11-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:46 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Plenty of kernels nowdays do a bit of TCP and socket process in > process/thread context; so you need to do your socket TX/RX in > different processes/threads to get parallelism in the networking side > of things. Very good point. > You cou

Hudson build is back to normal: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #241

2009-11-19 Thread noc
See

Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #240

2009-11-19 Thread noc
See Changes: [Francesco Chemolli ] Fix testheaders.sh to work with non-gcc compilers [Francesco Chemolli ] Fix handling of --disable-strict-error-checking. Add chmod to the list of searched-for programs during configuration

Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-FreeBSD-7.2 #29

2009-11-19 Thread noc
See Changes: [Amos Jeffries ] Send correct Connection: header on intercepted replies Intercepted apps are expecting Connection: back from the server not our default Proxy-Connection: [Automatic source maintenance ] SourceForma

Incorrect latest release specified in downloads page

2009-11-19 Thread Kinkie
Hi all, http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/ incorrectly mentions 3.0S19 as the latest release in the train. -- /kinkie

Re: Squid-3.1 release?

2009-11-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: What is the status for 3.1? At a minimum I would say it's about time for a 3.1.0.15 release, collecting up what has been done so far. I was planning it for this weekend, but have run out of time. Will be next week. Just holding out hope for that Solaris ICMP issue b