Dear squid-cache.org,
I have three RHEL4 servers :
1. configured with squid 2.6 Version 2.6.STABLE16 in
accelerator mode
2. configured with (apache) httpd daemon
3. this machine has curl installed (to generate http
requests)
Each time I do curl http://omp.wc.be/home.html, I
notice that the WC
Thanks for your input, but unfortunately it is still
not working.
each time I launch : [curl-machine]#curl
http://omp.wc.be/home.html I get in store.log :
1192090981.782 RELEASE 00 0018
CE042BF5E20CD75407DE72B1C8D0CA2C 200 1192093905
1192089432-1 text/html 18/18 GET
http://omp.wc.be
and then I
noticed the pragma option ...
I spend 4 days on this default value and I want to
thank you for your effort !
--- Raemaekers Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your input, but unfortunately it is still
> not working.
>
> each time I launch : [curl-ma
Hi squid-users,
I am wondering if it possible to run squid on a
machine having only one ethernet interface.
This means that both the requests coming from http
clients and request going to originserver acutally go
over one and the same ethernet interface.
In addition , can the IP address of the
Dear squid-users,
-I have 2 squid 2.6.STABLE16 machines on linux
-one loadbalancer of F5 (version 9)
-one apache http server.
The loadbalancer has the functionality of opening only
1 TCP connection to a certain squid wc.
This means that the TCP connections of several HTTP
clients are actually mu
For me it is not clear why an accelerator mode WC is
faster then a Transparant Mode webcache.
This is how I understand both modes after googling for
about half a day on this topic :
WC IN TRANSPARANT MODE (WCTM), When an http request
hits the WCTM for the second time, then the WC will
send its ca
Thanks in advance,
Mark.
--- Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raemaekers Mark wrote:
> > For me it is not clear why an accelerator mode WC
> is
> > faster then a Transparant Mode webcache.
> > This is how I understand both modes after googling
> fo
ROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 05:31 -0700, Raemaekers Mark
> wrote:
> > What mode of WC (so transparent or accelerator)
> will
> > give me the best performance and why ? Or is there
> no
> > difference with respect to performance ?
>
> The different