I did setup a full transparent caching machine based on Nicholas
Ritter's guide:
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@squid-cache.org/msg65056.html
Cache machine is a Cent OS 5.3
Router is;
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.2(11)T8, RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
Squid config is;
ht
Hello,
Am 10.07.2009 um 07:29 schrieb Behnam B.Marandi:
I did setup a full transparent caching machine based on Nicholas
Ritter's guide:
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@squid-cache.org/msg65056.html
Cache machine is a Cent OS 5.3
Router is;
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Versi
Thanks for quick replay.
I did set "ip wccp web-cache" in the router config but;
#sh ip wccp web-cache detail
No information is available for the service.
In case of access-list, what I got from step 35 is that access-list just
used for excluding specific web sites from redirecting to
Am 10.07.2009 um 08:19 schrieb Behnam B.Marandi:
Thanks for quick replay.
I did set "ip wccp web-cache" in the router config but;
#sh ip wccp web-cache detail
No information is available for the service.
try to debug wccp
#debug wccp packet
can you see any packets from your squid en
#debug ip wccp packet
WCCP packet info debugging is on
After that there are no debug message like "Here_I_Am"... something.
one more thing; After applying iptables rules no more new ssh session to
cache machine is possible. Anyone knows why?
Behnam.
Tom Penndorf wrote:
Am 10.07.2009 um 08:
#show ip wccp 80 detail
WCCP Cache-Engine information:
IP Address:xx.xx.241.40
Protocol Version: 2.0
State: Usable
Initial Hash Info:
Behnam-
The router is either not seeing the WCCP registration from the squid
box, or the squid box is not seeing the ack from the router. Tom's
suggestion of "debug ip wccp" is a good start.
The IOS version makes a huge difference. Between revisions of IOS, WCCP
works and/or breaks, so it is some
I'll try to boot router with 12.4.x IOS via tftp and test setup again.
Thanks so much.
I'll write back the result.
Behnam.
Ritter, Nicholas wrote:
Behnam-
The router is either not seeing the WCCP registration from the squid
box, or the squid box is not seeing the ack from the router. Tom's
sug
I Checked the packages using tcpdump and it seems that the router and
cache machine have no problem communicating via WCCP:
8.061995 xx.xx.241.40 xx.xx.241.39 WCCP 2.0 Here I am
8.062036 xx.xx.241.40 xx.xx.241.39 WCCP 2.0 Here I am
8.065416 xx.xx.241.39 xx.xx.241.40 WCCP
Sorry,
Link of the message was wrong:
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-...@squid-cache.org/msg04302.html
Behnam.
Ritter, Nicholas wrote:
Behnam-
The router is either not seeing the WCCP registration from the squid
box, or the squid box is not seeing the ack from the router. Tom's
suggest
Sorry again,
Don't know why developer's Mailing List URL doesn't copy here correctly.
Once again;
http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-...@squid-cache.org/msg04302.html
Behnam.
Ritter, Nicholas wrote:
Behnam-
The router is either not seeing the WCCP registration from the squid
box, or the sq
0:10 AM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] CentOS/Squid/Tproxy but no transfer
>
> I Checked the packages using tcpdump and it seems that the router and
> cache machine have no problem communicating via WCCP:
> 8.061995 xx.xx.241.40 xx.xx.241.3
essage-
>> From: Behnam B.Marandi [mailto:blix...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:10 AM
>> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] CentOS/Squid/Tproxy but no transfer
>>
>> I Checked the packages using tcpdump and it seems th
2009/7/14 Amos Jeffries :
> Aha! duplicate syn-ack is exactly the case I got a good trace of earlier.
> Turned out to be missing config on the cisco box.
Do you have an example of this particular (mis) configuration? The
note in the Wiki article isn't very clear.
> The Features/Tproxy4 wiki pag
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:19:43 +0800, Adrian Chadd
wrote:
> 2009/7/14 Amos Jeffries :
>
>> Aha! duplicate syn-ack is exactly the case I got a good trace of
>> earlier.
>> Turned out to be missing config on the cisco box.
>
> Do you have an example of this particular (mis) configuration? The
> not
2009/7/14 Amos Jeffries :
>> Do you have an example of this particular (mis) configuration? The
>> note in the Wiki article isn't very clear.
>
> I don't. The admin only mentioned that by adding a bypass on service group
> fixed the issue.
> I had a tcpdump of as set of requests showing pairs of s
Am 14.07.2009 um 06:25 schrieb Adrian Chadd:
2009/7/14 Amos Jeffries :
Do you have an example of this particular (mis) configuration? The
note in the Wiki article isn't very clear.
I don't. The admin only mentioned that by adding a bypass on
service group
fixed the issue.
I had a tcpdump
Few days ago a friend of mine who is more experienced than me in case of
network administration and Cisco devices, helped me to configure tproxy.
We tested the configuration and it worked. The trick was separating
Inbound, Outbound and cache machine(s) subnets. I don't know it's how
the traffic
18 matches
Mail list logo