Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-12-02 Thread Graham Keeling
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:40:52AM +, Graham Keeling wrote: > Hello, > > I am convinced that this is a serious bug, so I have entered a proper bug > report. > > It is bug 3113: > > http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3113 I have created a simple patch that seems to fix the problem f

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-12-01 Thread Graham Keeling
Hello, I am convinced that this is a serious bug, so I have entered a proper bug report. It is bug 3113: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3113

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Graham Keeling
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:31:45AM +, Graham Keeling wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:46:47PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffries > >> wrote: > >>> On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: > > Gra

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Graham Keeling
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:46:47PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >>> On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload probl

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Oguz Yilmaz
-- Oguz YILMAZ On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffries >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/11/10 21:23, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our systems, we use Squid

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Oguz Yilmaz
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: >> >> Graham, >> >> This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem >> in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. >> >> On our systems, we use Squid 3.0.STABLE25. Before

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/11/10 04:04, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our systems, we use Squid 3.0.STABLE25. Before squid a dansguardian(DG) proxy exist to filter. Results of my tests: 1- DG

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-29 Thread Oguz Yilmaz
Graham, This is the best explanation I have seen about ongoing upload problem in proxy chains where squid is one part of the chain. On our systems, we use Squid 3.0.STABLE25. Before squid a dansguardian(DG) proxy exist to filter. Results of my tests: 1- DG+Squid 2.6.STABLE12: No problem of uploa

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 27/11/10 05:10, Graham Keeling wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:36:49PM +, Graham Keeling wrote: Hello, I have upgraded to squid-3.1 recently, and found a change of behaviour. I have been using dansguardian in front of squid. It appears to be because squid now buffers uploaded POST dat

Re: [squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-26 Thread Graham Keeling
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:36:49PM +, Graham Keeling wrote: > Hello, > > I have upgraded to squid-3.1 recently, and found a change of behaviour. > I have been using dansguardian in front of squid. > > It appears to be because squid now buffers uploaded POST data slightly > differently. > In v

[squid-users] squid-3.1 client POST buffering

2010-11-25 Thread Graham Keeling
Hello, I have upgraded to squid-3.1 recently, and found a change of behaviour. I have been using dansguardian in front of squid. It appears to be because squid now buffers uploaded POST data slightly differently. In versions < 3.1, it would take some data, send it through to the website, and then