Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 17/07/14 20:56, Andras FOGARASI wrote: On 7/17/14, 5:34 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Andras FOGARASI wrote: On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: I would expect that if it was a NAT issue you would see it much sooner than 15 minutes, 30-60 seconds. Ar

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-17 Thread Andras FOGARASI
On 7/17/14, 5:34 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Andras FOGARASI wrote: > >> >> On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: >>> I would expect that if it was a NAT issue you would see it much sooner than >>> 15 minutes, 30-60 seconds. Are session timers being str

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-17 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Andras FOGARASI wrote: > > On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: >> I would expect that if it was a NAT issue you would see it much sooner than >> 15 minutes, 30-60 seconds. Are session timers being stripped by Kamailio? >> You say it's a TURN server or i

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-17 Thread Andras FOGARASI
On 7/17/14, 3:41 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Andras FOGARASI wrote: > >> On 7/16/14, 10:00 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>> wrote: >>> Hello, I expect that the signaling is ok at least

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-17 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Jul 16, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Andras FOGARASI wrote: > On 7/16/14, 10:00 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: >> >> On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup. >>> >>> From signling point of view, I c

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-16 Thread Andras FOGARASI
On 7/16/14, 10:00 PM, Frank Carmickle wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup. >> >> From signling point of view, I can think of following situations: >> - endpoints send keep alive pac

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-16 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup. > > From signling point of view, I can think of following situations: > - endpoints send keep alive packets (or session updates) which are no > answered. You ca

Re: [SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I expect that the signaling is ok at least for call setup. From signling point of view, I can think of following situations: - endpoints send keep alive packets (or session updates) which are no answered. You can add an xlog(...) at the top of request_route{} and reply_route{} blocks pr

[SR-Users] Some of the calls drops after 15 minutes + some seconds

2014-07-16 Thread Andras FOGARASI
Hi, I have a simple kamailio install (2 servers, using location service and a failover node with dispatcher, STUN, clients behind different NATs), without rtpproxy, only peer-to-peer RTP and TURN server if the connection is really messy (it's not relevant here). Signaling is over TLS. Both of the