Re: [Standards] XEP-0045: Reserved Nicks and GC Compatibility

2011-11-07 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 10/5/11 2:11 PM, Mike Wacker wrote: > On 10/4/2011 10:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 10/3/11 5:11 PM, Mike Wacker wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> One of the tenets of XEP-0045 is backwards-compatibility with groupchat >>> 1.0. >> Additional features do not necessarily introduce incompatibility.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0045 1.25rc7

2011-11-07 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 10/24/11 3:13 AM, Mike Wacker wrote: > On 10/3/2011 8:05 PM, Mike Wacker wrote: >> I've checked a new provisional version of XEP-0045 into git... >> >> Latest diff: >> >> http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0045/diff/1.25rc6/vs/1.25rc7 >> >> Diff from 1.24: >> >> http://xmpp.org/extensions/d

Re: [Standards] XEP-0045 1.25rc7

2011-11-07 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 10/6/11 4:36 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 05.10.2011 21:56, schrieb Mike Wacker: >> On 10/4/2011 11:15 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: If the server never times out a room that is created but not configured and unlocked, then an easy DOS vector is to flood the server with room cre