On 5/23/12 1:28 AM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 03:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 5/22/12 12:40 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
>>
>> Well, the need to *change* it from the default to some reasonable value
>> implies that the default value is unreasonable. That might depend on
>> implement
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote:
>
> On 20 apr. 2012, at 10:32, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> One solution I came up with was for an entity that relays and archives
>>> messages to stamp the message with: >> id="1234-5678"/
On 20 apr. 2012, at 10:32, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> One solution I came up with was for an entity that relays and archives
>> messages to stamp the message with: > id="1234-5678"/> or > id="8765-4321"/>. I'd be interested in feedback on this id
