[Standards] UPnP and XMPP

2014-06-11 Thread Steffen Larsen
I haven’t heard anything from the XMPP/UPnP Liaisons, but I just stumbled over this on the UPnP homepage (http://upnp.org/news/2014/): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-QpNnQrT2U&list=UUY7zsGPIO9PRbUDv1obTBWQ Personally I am hoping for some progress for Multi-Screen and XMPP which I have been w

Re: [Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

2014-06-11 Thread Philipp Hancke
Am 11.06.2014 20:16, schrieb Graham King: Hi, In XEP-0030 (Service Discovery - http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html#security), it says "the server MUST return a error if": The requesting entity is not authorized to receive presence from the target entity (i.e., via a presence subscripti

Re: [Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

2014-06-11 Thread Graham King
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14-06-11 11:29 AM, Lance Stout wrote: > On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Graham King wrote: >> >> Is this a correct reading? From the code I think this is how Prosody >> interprets it, and it makes intuitive sense (to me at least!). If this >> re

Re: [Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

2014-06-11 Thread Lance Stout
On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Graham King wrote: > > Is this a correct reading? From the code I think this is how Prosody > interprets it, and it makes intuitive sense (to me at least!). If this > reading is correct, could I submit a patch to the XEP to clarify? Sounds right. Send a patch. —

[Standards] Disco presence subscription confusion

2014-06-11 Thread Graham King
Hi, In XEP-0030 (Service Discovery - http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html#security), it says "the server MUST return a error if": > The requesting entity is not authorized to receive presence from the target > entity (i.e., via a presence subscription of type "both" or "from") That reads