Too bad...XEP-0313 is still experimental and XEP-0136 is deprecated already.16.11.2017, 00:25, "Sam Whited" :Hi all,This email is to let you know that XEP-0136: Message Archiving [1] hasbeen moved to a stats of Deprecated per a vote of the Council. The newversion will be
Hi all,
This email is to let you know that XEP-0136: Message Archiving [1] has
been moved to a stats of Deprecated per a vote of the Council. The new
version will be published and live on the website soon.
—Sam
[1]: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0136.html
Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:34:04 -
Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote:
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: Message Markup
> Abstract:
> This specification provides an alternative to XHTML-IM with rigid
> separation of content and
That's nice!This XEP is still too raw.15.11.2017, 19:58, "Sam Whited" :Given the feedback on this thread, the council voted today NOT toadvance XEP-0313 to draft.The XEP will return to experimental until some of the feedback isaddressed.—SamOn Mon, Oct 16, 2017, at 12:38, Jonas
2017-11-15 XSF Council Minutes
==
Chat Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-11-15
Chair:
* Tobias Markmann (Tobias)
Present:
* Sam Whited (SamWhited)
* Dave Cridland (dwd)
* Daniel Gultsch (daniel)
* Emmanuel Gil Peyrot (Link Mauve)
Minute taker:
* JC Brand
* Jonas Wielicki [2017-10-16 18:38]:
> 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
As I understood it, the reasoning for the last namespace bump to mam:2
was to offer the guarantee that stanza IDs are added to live messages as
per XEP-0359. So if the
Given the feedback on this thread, the council voted today NOT to
advance XEP-0313 to draft.
The XEP will return to experimental until some of the feedback is
addressed.
—Sam
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017, at 12:38, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
>
I appreciate all of the discussion around the component protocol. I'm
still pretty torn on which direction is right, but for now I've decided
that this isn't important enough to block progress on. I am going to
leave it in and ask the council for a vote (I already did actually,
sorry, sent this
Hi,
My votes are inline.
> On 8. Nov 2017, at 17:49, JC Brand wrote:
>
> 2017-11-08 XSF Council Minutes
> ==
>
> Chat Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-11-08
>
> Chair:
>
> * Emmanuel Gil Peyrot (Link Mauve)
>
> Present:
>
> * Sam
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017, at 04:06, Mathieu Pasquet wrote:
> One thing that bugs me is that this XEP is supposed to specify the
> existing behavior of several clients regarding various pieces of markup
> (Gajim, Psi, etc…), but on the other hand it does not exactly match with
> either (from what I
Hi all,
There seems to have been some heated discussion last night and I'd like
to address a few things where there seems to be some confusion:
The act of accepting an XEP does not instantly make it the one-true-way
to do things. Experimental XEPs are exactly that, experimental. They
might catch
On November 15, 2017 at 03:59:46, Ruslan N. Marchenko (m...@ruff.mobi) wrote:
>
>
> On 14.11.2017 22:37, Sam Whited wrote:
> >
> > What do the server devs here think?
> >
> >
> To be fair this protocol is implemented in majority(?) of existing xmpp
> server implementations so the burden is zero.
>
On 14.11.2017 16:38, Kim Alvefur wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 06:38:45PM -, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
>> XEP-0313.
>> 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
>
> I also think that the way preferences are returned
On Mittwoch, 15. November 2017 11:06:16 CET Mathieu Pasquet wrote:
> - In 5.8, I think having blockquotes start with "> " (spaced) and not ">"
> would be better, as we can already see conversations quoting "><" smileys.
A huge plus one for that, even though it requires additional rules for
Sounds reassuring. I guess I'll try to join the Council next time.15.11.2017, 10:49, "Jonas Wielicki" :On Mittwoch, 15. November 2017 10:32:29 CET Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: 1) no matter what arguments you bring if a Council member wants it, it will be merged making all XSF
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:58:15AM -0600, Sam Whited wrote:
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: Styling
>
> Abstract:
>
> > This specification defines a plain-text formatting syntax for use in
> > exchanging instant messages with simple text styling.
On 15 November 2017 at 09:15, Goffi wrote:
> Good morning/evening/day eveybody
>
> Le mercredi 15 novembre 2017, 09:54:07 CET Dave Cridland a écrit :
>> Conversations is following an existing trend. Sam has merely documented it,
>> and we're trying to ensure that the downsides of
On 15 November 2017 at 08:59, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 14.11.2017 22:37, Sam Whited wrote:
>>
>>
>> What do the server devs here think?
>>
>>
> To be fair this protocol is implemented in majority(?) of existing xmpp
> server implementations so the burden is zero.
> The
Good morning/evening/day eveybody
Le mercredi 15 novembre 2017, 09:54:07 CET Dave Cridland a écrit :
> Conversations is following an existing trend. Sam has merely documented it,
> and we're trying to ensure that the downsides of this approach - and I
> don't think anyone pretends there aren't
Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:54:07 +
Dave Cridland wrote:
> Conversations is following an existing trend. Sam has merely
> documented it, and we're trying to ensure that the downsides of this
> approach - and I don't think anyone pretends there aren't any - are
> mitigated.
Fine.
On 14.11.2017 22:37, Sam Whited wrote:
What do the server devs here think?
To be fair this protocol is implemented in majority(?) of existing xmpp
server implementations so the burden is zero.
The question is rather - what is the future vision for this component
protocol? It considered as
On 15 Nov 2017 07:44, "Evgeny Khramtsov" wrote:
Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:21:22 +0300
Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
> I hope the Council will never accept such inconsistent thing as an
> official XEP.
Too late, it's already implemented in Conversations and, since
On a side-note: please try to keep discussions positive. Not only does that
make for a friendlier conversation, arguments are much more likely to be
taken into consideration if you don't start off by putting people off.
On 15 November 2017 at 08:45, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
23 matches
Mail list logo