On Montag, 26. Februar 2018 16:59:46 CET Simon Friedberger wrote:
> So, lest this discussion just die. Here is a proposal:
>
> *
>
> Client-A generates message-ID based on HASH(connection_counter,
> server_salt). The connection_counter needs to be maintained only for
> one connectio
On 2/27/18 10:33 AM, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote:
> Am Montag, den 26.02.2018, 19:21 -0700 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>>
>> The idea there was to allow multiple files to be sent in a session;
>> you
>> wouldn't close the session if you want to send more files, so you
>> would
>> send the element def
Am Montag, den 26.02.2018, 19:21 -0700 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>
> The idea there was to allow multiple files to be sent in a session;
> you
> wouldn't close the session if you want to send more files, so you
> would
> send the element defined in §8.1 instead. IMHO a good
> solution would be t
On 2/27/18 5:40 AM, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> For reference, XEPs that list the given XEP as a dependency (to what
> extent they actually make use of it is another matter):
Thanks. Further comments inline.
> *XEP-0020 (Feature Negotiation; Draft; 2006-11-21)*
> - XEP-0041 (Reliable Entity Link; Retra)
For reference, XEPs that list the given XEP as a dependency (to what extent
they actually make use of it is another matter):
XEP-0020 (Feature Negotiation; Draft; 2006-11-21)
- XEP-0041 (Reliable Entity Link; Retra)
- XEP-0052 (File Transfer; Retra)
- XEP-0116 (Encrypted Session Negotiation;