Sun, 2 Sep 2018 10:22:40 +0200
Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
> This is wrong, XEP-0045 notes that RFC6121 mandates that a server
> would broadcast an unavailable presence to all previous directed
> presence targets, this means the server MUST track them
Well now this is wrong :) The server only
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:06:20PM +0200, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> This is meant for MUC presence. Servers don't necessarily track muc joins
> or other directed presences.
This is wrong, XEP-0045 notes that RFC6121 mandates that a server would
broadcast an unavailable presence to all previous
