On 4/11/15, 1:36 PM, "Christian Schudt" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I think Variant 1 violates XEP-0045: When receiving a „request“ message from
>an occupant in a MUC room (type=groupchat), the receiver would send a receipt
>to the sender directly, not to the MUC room, by simply sending it to the
>„from“ a
On 10/12/12 7:53 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" wrote:
>>> (I also wonder why we don't support for inline quotation...)
>>
>> Yes, it seems that the set of allowed tags should be reviewed too.
>
>Maybe. :) I'm sure we had good reasons for the limited subset we defined
>in 2003-2004, and I am not sure
On 8/22/12 10:33 AM, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
>I agree with Sergey. If you received XHTML-IM, then any other rich text
>transform ought to be disabled/bypassed.
What about URLs that are not in elements?
--
Joe Hildebrand
Or suggest to change *this* to this or
*this*.
On 8/21/12 2:57 AM, "Sergey Dobrov" wrote:
>Btw, often implementation of XHTML-IM conflicts with internal
>hyperlinks/smiles/plain text formatting like *this*. Maybe it will be
>useful to add recommendation to switch any these parsers off when a
>cl
