er Waher
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Teemu Väisänen [mailto:uol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 10 december 2013 14:37
> To: XMPP Standards; Peter Waher
> Subject: Re: [Standards] eventlogging xeps
>
> Hi Peter.
>
> Section 7.3.2 Publish/Subscribe describes: &quo
er
Subject: Re: [Standards] eventlogging xeps
Hi Peter.
Section 7.3.2 Publish/Subscribe describes: "Event messages could be published
using Publish-Subscribe. But, even more care should be taken to log only
information that can be published openly. If there's risk for sensitive
info
Hi Peter.
Section 7.3.2 Publish/Subscribe describes: "Event messages could be
published using Publish-Subscribe. But, even more care should be taken
to log only information that can be published openly. If there's risk
for sensitive information to be logged, the publish/subscribe pattern
should be
would be best to use those.
The updated proposal contains namespace declarations where needed.
Best regards,
Peter Waher
-Original Message-
From: Waqas Hussain [mailto:waqa...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 9 december 2013 18:20
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] eventlogging xeps
O
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
>> Hello Philipp
>>
>> Thanks for your input. I've updated the according to your comments, and
>> attach a new version.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter Waher
>>
>
> Hey Peter,
>
> Something whi
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello Philipp
>
> Thanks for your input. I've updated the according to your comments, and
> attach a new version.
>
> Best regards,
> Peter Waher
>
Hey Peter,
Something which I don't think has been discussed: Encoding. I'm
assuming syslog-to-
Hello Lance
Thanks for your input. I'll respond to your concerns one at a time:
Minor things I noticed:
- The timestamp attribute. We've been using 'stamp' as the name for that type
of attribute.
Time stamp is otherwise a known and well-defined term. Stamp makes me think of
snail mail
Hi Lance,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Lance Stout wrote:
> Minor things I noticed:
>
> - The timestamp attribute. We’ve been using ‘stamp’ as the name for that type
> of attribute.
> - The type and level attribute values are currently title cased, but I
> personally prefer lowercase values
Hi Peter,
This is looking really good!
Minor things I noticed:
- The timestamp attribute. We’ve been using ‘stamp’ as the name for that type
of attribute.
- The type and level attribute values are currently title cased, but I
personally prefer lowercase values since that is what is commonly us
