Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft

2007-11-19 Thread Travis Vitek
Martin Sebor wrote: > > I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated > version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most > important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of > releases, and the integration of the Version Policy (I plan to delete >

Re: svn commit: r596354 - /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/tests/utilities/20.auto.ptr.cpp

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Sebor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: faridz Date: Mon Nov 19 08:20:27 2007 New Revision: 596354 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596354&view=rev Log: 2007-11-19 Farid Zaripov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * 20.auto.ptr.cpp (test_auto_ptr): Worked around bug in MSVC 7.x. Which one? Details plea

RE: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0)

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:11 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC > (8.0 and 9.0) > > > Yes, I've tried it and after applying this patch the pro

Re: [PATCH] 22.locale.ctype.is.cpp

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Sebor
Martin Sebor wrote: Seems reasonable. We should also guard the calls to the the wchar_t specializations of the function with _RWSTD_NO_WCHAR_T. On second thought, isn't there a more robust way of fixing this, one that makes it work regardless of the order of the calls to the function? E.g., hav

Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0)

2007-11-19 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:37 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0) I'm not sure outlining the function is the most ef

RE: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC (8.0 and 9.0)

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:37 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: 21.string.cons.cpp test fails on 64-bit MSVC > (8.0 and 9.0) > > > I'm not sure outlining the function is the most efficient

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-226) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-226: - Attachment: new_capacity.patch > __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math > ---

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-226) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-226: - Attachment: (was: new_capacity.patch) > __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math >

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-226) __rw::__rw_new_capacity() uses floating point math

2007-11-19 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543588 ] Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-226: -- We can replace _RWSTD_RATIO_DIVIDER == 1000 to 1024 and then replace div