RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-04-04 Thread David Graham
:-D Oh, okay... so we aren't going to get ahead of ourselves? Shucks! I thought the goal was to get everything done "good enough" and then move on ;-). Thanks for the tip. I will check out the needs in commons. Thanks! Any help you can give is much appreciated. David _

RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-04-04 Thread Brandon Goodin
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction >P.S. When will the 2.0 discussions start? I would love to be involved in >them... If you're anxious to talk about 2.0 why not volunteer some time in

RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-04-04 Thread David Graham
P.S. When will the 2.0 discussions start? I would love to be involved in them... If you're anxious to talk about 2.0 why not volunteer some time in the commons projects we're dependant on so we can finish 1.1? DBCP and Pool still need some work. David __

RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-04-04 Thread Brandon Goodin
Brandon Goodin P.S. When will the 2.0 discussions start? I would love to be involved in them... -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 5:14 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction The altern

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-04-04 Thread Ted Husted
The alternative Erik is thinking of is FindForward http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold/src/java/org/apache/struts/scaffold/FindForwardAction.java The idea is that you include a "forward=whatever" in the request, and it trundles through the local and global forwards look

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 10:01 AM, Brandon Goodin wrote: I'm curious why you consider it such a problem. It has solved several issues for me. Quite the opposite. I rarely use the base Action class :-) LookupDispatchAction itself requires a tighter coupling between what is in the presentatio

RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread Brandon Goodin
List Subject: Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction good ol' LookupDispatchAction I know folks are using it and seem to like it, but I created it in the context of a project gone way wrong and now that I'm on to something bigger and better I have not used it at all, believ

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread David Graham
I have made some needed changes and updates to the ValidatorLookupDispatchAction (scheduled for 1.2). But, I cannot decide on whether I should keep the name as ValidatorLookupDispatchAction (which is a mouthful) or change it to VLDAction (tight! baby!). What do you all think? -1 The longer name des

Re: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-31 Thread Erik Hatcher
good ol' LookupDispatchAction I know folks are using it and seem to like it, but I created it in the context of a project gone way wrong and now that I'm on to something bigger and better I have not used it at all, believe it or not. I just want to say "my apologies" to the Struts team for

ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction

2003-03-30 Thread Brandon Goodin
I have made some needed changes and updates to the ValidatorLookupDispatchAction (scheduled for 1.2). But, I cannot decide on whether I should keep the name as ValidatorLookupDispatchAction (which is a mouthful) or change it to VLDAction (tight! baby!). What do you all think? Brandon Goodin