our help and thought!
-- adam
- Original Message -
From: "Matthias Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:20 AM
Subject: Re: workflow extension question
Adam,
sorry that I obviously did n
easily be
achieved using your framework?
Thank you again for all your help and thought!
-- adam
- Original Message -
From: "Matthias Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:20 AM
Subje
Adam,
sorry that I obviously did not make myself clear enough. Look at the
following definitions:
global-forwards:
workflowViolation_wiz1step1: violatedWizard1Step1
workflowViolation_wiz1step2: violatedWizard1Step2
displayWizard1Step1
primaryWorkflow: wiz1step1
newState: displayed
nextState: sub
Or can they co-exist together nicely ?
Thanks for your help.
-- adam
From: Matthias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: workflow extension question
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 200
Adam,
there is a solution to your requirement. If I get you right, here is
what you want to do: You are in a modal dialog. If the user clicks on
some link he violates the workflow. The action that violates the
workflow should check whether this is a nextState violation. Upon
nextState violatio
Hi,
I think what you are saying (The scenarios you have described )is not possible with
the current workflow implementation.
Because when a user leaves a workflow(Like you said, he is bored and clicks on a menu
link.), then there is a workflow violation and the workFLow for whicch this violation
6 matches
Mail list logo