Sorry for the late answer,
2013/9/15 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
as discussed in another thread, the sugar-toolkit bundlebuilder dev command
is not respecting the SUGAR_ACTIVITIES_PATH (a fix for that landed in
sugar-toolkit-gtk3 recently).
Thanks for the fix.
I wonder if
-1
Please don't remove the dev command.
It works. If you don't use does not means other don't find it useful.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Sorry for the late answer,
2013/9/15 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
as discussed
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I wonder if we should just drop the dev command, and suggest to develop
directly in sugar-build/activities (or ~/Activities when outside
sugar-build). All that the command does is to create a symlink anyway, if
someone really wants
Fair enough, I'll let people which cares about gtk2 toolkit and the dev
command fix that bug :)
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
-1
Please don't remove the dev command.
It works. If you don't use does not means other don't find it useful.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 18,
We now need to make the license changes in the sugar-artwork git. And to
finish up the ones in the sugar-web modules (if I remember correctly we
have not added headers yet).
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Tony Sebro*
Date: Monday, 16 September 2013
Subject: C. Scott Ananian (Re:
I wish I could do that but I'm not really able to commit to meeting
schedules these days. It's a lot easier for me to work async. It's not like
you can't do this without me though :) I can read the logs and comment.
On Monday, 16 September 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
What you (and other in the
I finally got web activities working on XO-4, in the AU build
published yesterday [1] . I did it by modifying webactivities.py to
use WebKitGTK1 instead of v2. The changes are:
https://github.com/manuq/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-1/compare/webacts-webkit1
I tried it with Gears Activity v3, and is
This is great news.
-walter
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
I finally got web activities working on XO-4, in the AU build
published yesterday [1] . I did it by modifying webactivities.py to
use WebKitGTK1 instead of v2. The changes are:
It is only an issue for sugar-build, not Sugar installed by
non-developers. And it is documented [1]. And ls -s
sugar-build/activities Activities works.
-walter
[1] http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html#activities
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
Fantastic. Good work!
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
I finally got web activities working on XO-4, in the AU build
published yesterday [1] . I did it by modifying webactivities.py to
use WebKitGTK1 instead of v2. The changes are:
I people continue using ~/Activities directory is not a problem, right?
What is the point of move the directory where the activities are installed?
Changing these directories without a good motive _is_ a problem.
Nobody will update the documentation, wiki pages,
tutorials, and development book,
Nothing changed in sugar itself, I just fixed obvious bugs, like
environment variables not being consistently respected, nonsense code
duplication etc.
About sugar-build, the change is necessary because you want everything to
be contained in the mounted directory (sugar-build), so that it's
Nice work. Did you check that you are actually getting a different origin
in each activity using the new approach to activity://?
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I finally got web activities working on XO-4, in the AU build
published yesterday [1] . I did it by
2013/9/18 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Nice work. Did you check that you are actually getting a different origin in
each activity using the new approach to activity://?
Logged document.location.origin, it gives file://, that's why I had to
add the 'enable-file-access-from-file-uris'
You could put an http server in the activity... Sucks but I'm not sure
there is a better way :/
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I finally got web activities working on XO-4, in the AU build
published yesterday [1] . I did it by modifying webactivities.py to
use
This is for the potential security risk of opening files outside of the
activity directory,
or because can be a problem with different activities running at the same
time
or multiple instances of the same activity?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
You mean why the http server would be a problem?
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
This is for the potential security risk of opening files outside of the
activity directory,
or because can be a problem with different activities running at the same
time
or multiple
No, why is needed use a local web server instead of
the use of the proposed solution (use 'enable-file-access-from-file-uris' )
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean why the http server would be a problem?
On Wednesday, 18 September
Well, there are several html features which depend on each activity having
their own origin, for example local storage.
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
No, why is needed use a local web server instead of
the use of the proposed solution (use
Ok. Thanks.
The web server need have something special or just serve a directory is
enough?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, there are several html features which depend on each activity having
their own origin, for example local
Yeah, a web server is how this issue is usually overcome. I was
expecting a proper way but seems that only webkit2 has one, the
register_uri_scheme .
2013/9/18 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org:
Ok. Thanks.
The web server need have something special or just serve a directory is
enough?
Just a directory. It needs to be one server per activity though, so that
the different port gives us a different origin.
On 18 September 2013 23:32, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Ok. Thanks.
The web server need have something special or just serve a directory is
enough?
Gonzalo
Map-2.xo (or thereabouts) had a web server built in. I don't remember the
specifics, but if someone can dig up the code there might be some ideas in
there. I recall Dan Williams was helpful in drafting a script for finding
the best available port per activity instance.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at
23 matches
Mail list logo
