Apparently my English is a bit garbled. I apologize.
What I am doing is going down the list of activities on ASLO as shown in
download.sugarlabs.org where each activity is given a four digit
'add-on' identification.
There were 137 with repositories already on github. For these, the
needed ac
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:58:45AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> My problem with this exercise is it again postpones action to
> fulfill the mission.
The board is responsible for what it talks about and decides, and it
is not for me to complain about their prioritisation, since I'm not a
board mem
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:48:16AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> 1. The original repository is ASLO.
No, the originals were mostly on laptop.org and on developer web
sites, including Gitorious and GitHub.
> The git.sugarlabs.org was added later.
No, the Sugar Labs Gitorious instance was set up i
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:21:40AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Hi James, Walter
>
> I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
> github/ sugarlabs.
>
> Of these 47 are not duplicates to repositories on git.sugalabs.org.
But you omit repositories in other than git.sugarlab
1. The original repository is ASLO. The git.sugarlabs.org was added
later. The intent, as I understand it, is to have the master source code
under git version control on github as a replacement for
git.sugarlabs.org. The git record of the programming change from version
to version should be inv
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:21:21PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
>
> We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license.
>
> That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer
> true. In fact it's
On Apr 23, 2017 11:21 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote:
Hi James, Walter
I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
github/sugarlabs
Thank you Tony!
Unless I hear to the contrary, I'll delete these duplicates.
Sounds good to me
My understanding from the community is that ac
Hi James, Walter
I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in
github/sugarlabs.
Of these 47 are not duplicates to repositories on git.sugalabs.org.
The duplicates are:
abecedarium-5.xo
amazonas_tortuga-2.xo
analyze_journal-5.xo
analyze-8.xo
anno-1.xo
annotate-1.xo
backup-
On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" wrote:
We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license.
That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer true. In fact
it's a big problem, because a lot of stuff is posted on github without a
libre license and requests to appl
My problem with this exercise is it again postpones action to fulfill
the mission.
The most critical need (under any version of the mission statement) is
to make Sugar available on a wide range of contemporary platforms so
that we can
escape the view that Sugar is locked to the XO. We then
On Apr 21, 2017 9:06 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote:
How is this not redundant to the motion approved in January 2017?
For me it's an obvious incremental improvement. You can call it redundant
if you think it's adds zero new value, but I am skeptical of that.
Dissent.
1.
For the duplication by Tony from activities.sugarlabs.org to
github.com/sugarlabs;
- for the commit history, we still have the original repository for
some activities.
- for the source code, now we have two places for some activities; the
original repository, and a copy with a
12 matches
Mail list logo
