> For long-term security and support, we could adopt the Linux model: push
> this concern down to the distributors and let them do a profitable
> business out of it.
>
> This creates a sustainable market for Sugar. Linux distributors who
> have successfully built a reputation for offering good cu
Philippe Clérié wrote:
>> I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
>> Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
>> issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
>> unanswered questions, present and future?
>>
>
> I sympathize since I'
El Sun, 20-09-2009 a las 09:33 -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka escribió:
> Because of my ignorant ways in interpreting things, which I trust is
> also the way of the populace :-), I think the wisest thing is to keep
> the SOaS moniker as a basic SLs thing, of course, of course
> recognizing Sebastian. I
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:34:51 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
> >> But the idea is for SLs to market only "Sugar on a Stick", whatever it
> >> is based on.
> >
> > Exactly. So what it is base
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
>> I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
>> Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
>> issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
>> unanswered questions, present and future?
>>
>
> I sympathize sinc
> I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
> Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
> issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
> unanswered questions, present and future?
>
I sympathize since I'm also a bit confused. This is
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
>> But the idea is for SLs to market only "Sugar on a Stick", whatever it
>> is based on.
>>
>
> Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
> customers.
Right, that's why the longer names such as "Debian Sugar on a Stick"
would refer to teams an
> But the idea is for SLs to market only "Sugar on a Stick", whatever it
> is based on.
>
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:24:42 Tomeu V
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié :
>> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
>> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
>> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc. From time to time SLs
>> would decide to call and market as "Sugar on a Stic
9 matches
Mail list logo
