Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-18 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC, >> fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora, >> debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org for Debian, >> ubuntu-sugart...@li

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC, > fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora, > debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org for Debian, > ubuntu-sugart...@lists.ubuntu.com for Ubuntu. Why SoaS would be > different and sh

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: >> >> == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == >> >> Without artificially privileging nor discriminati

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/15/2009 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: > > == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == > > Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So > a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the S

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: > > == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == > > Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So > a big +1 to giving a stronger identit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Future of Sugar on a Stick

2009-09-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is: == Further separation between upstream and downstreams == Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the SoaS project and to creating a separate mailing list.