On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC,
>> fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora,
>> debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org for Debian,
>> ubuntu-sugart...@li
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC,
> fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora,
> debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org for Debian,
> ubuntu-sugart...@lists.ubuntu.com for Ubuntu. Why SoaS would be
> different and sh
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is:
>>
>> == Further separation between upstream and downstreams ==
>>
>> Without artificially privileging nor discriminati
On 09/15/2009 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is:
>
> == Further separation between upstream and downstreams ==
>
> Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So
> a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the S
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is:
>
> == Further separation between upstream and downstreams ==
>
> Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So
> a big +1 to giving a stronger identit
FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is:
== Further separation between upstream and downstreams ==
Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So
a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the SoaS project and to
creating a separate mailing list.
6 matches
Mail list logo