Re: [Sugar-devel] New tool for tracking L10n commits

2011-09-02 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 02.09.2011, at 18:14, Chris Leonard wrote: > Bert, > > Would it be possible to limit what gets sent to > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/pootle-commits to only those > commits made by user Pootle? > > I do not want to flood the list with every eToys commit, only those > from user Pootle.

Re: [Sugar-devel] New tool for tracking L10n commits

2011-09-02 Thread Chris Leonard
Bert, Would it be possible to limit what gets sent to http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/pootle-commits to only those commits made by user Pootle? I do not want to flood the list with every eToys commit, only those from user Pootle. In addition, Aleksey modified the subject coming from git to t

Re: [Sugar-devel] New tool for tracking L10n commits

2011-09-02 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 02.09.2011, at 15:57, Chris Leonard wrote: > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/pootle-commits > Please note that > because eToys is hosted in it's own repository, this system will not > report commits from eToys at the moment. Pootle commits for Etoys are sent to http://lists.squ

[Sugar-devel] New tool for tracking L10n commits

2011-09-02 Thread Chris Leonard
Dear All, One of the things that can be confusing is keeping track of whether a given PO file that has been completed has been committed by the language admin or not. Activity developers can see this relatively easily by looking at the commit log for their specific activity, but when you want to