[Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

2010-03-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we finally figured out that GsmPalette.set_status() was overriding a met

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

2010-03-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 20:59, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting > erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense > Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday > > We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we > fin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

2010-03-10 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 08:17 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we > > finally figured out that GsmPalette.set_status() was overriding a method > > with the same name in its superclass. An unfortunate naming clash. > > These situations su