On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 00:34 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
>
> > On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce,
>
> Write 93 now starts and runs fine.
I regret and apologise that this was a false rep
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 09:26 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Great!
>
>
> What changed?
I don't know, I just did another pull, in case this had an effect.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/abiword.git/commit/abiword.spec?id=6d6db2d7f27b618045e667600d0ae9f6231627ed
Iain
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On
Great!
What changed?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
>
> > On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce,
>
> Write 93 now starts and runs fine.
>
> Thanks
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce,
Write 93 now starts and runs fine.
Thanks
Iain
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.suga
Should work. This is a bug.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:06 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > The Write error looks like the Abiword package do not have
> > introspection support enabled.
>
>
> == Wri
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:06 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> The Write error looks like the Abiword package do not have
> introspection support enabled.
== Write 93 Fails to start ==
> Anybody else using Ubuntu managed to solve the Write issue?
Is Write 93 known to run in any SoaS or PC environme
Hi,
@ Daniel thank you for the big improvement to sugar-build.
On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce,
3 days ago, on 17-10-2013,
I attempted to build sugar-build from
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html it failed at an
early stage.
Now it runs well.
All "o
On 19 October 2013 23:28, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
>> On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ==Fail to start==
>>> Write
>>>
>>
>> F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have gobject introspection typelib, not
>> sure w
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas
> wrote:
>
>> ==Fail to start==
>> Write
>>
>
> F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have gobject introspection typelib, not
> sure why :(
>
>
Is compiled with introspection support enabled?
We use
Hi,
the distro doesn't matter for sugar-build these days since we are using a
chroot. We should get this fixed in Fedora, if not in F19 at least in F20
(assuming it's not already fixed there).
On 19 October 2013 21:06, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> The Write error looks like the Abiword package do n
On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> ==Fail to start==
> Write
>
F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have gobject introspection typelib, not sure
why :(
> Record
>
Yeah, not really sure what is going on there from the trace. Someone needs
to look at the code and see what is failing
The Write error looks like the Abiword package do not have introspection
support enabled.
Daniel,
Do you plan add abiword to sugar-build (for non Fedora) or there are
another solution?
Anybody else using Ubuntu managed to solve the Write issue?
Gonzalo
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Iain Brow
T
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 11:15 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > On 19 October 2013 05:35, Iain Brown Douglas
> > wrote:
> > > Which git version and which distribution are you using?
> > >
On 19 October 2013 05:35, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> > Which git version and which distribution are you using?
> >
> Sorry that was not in OP
> Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS \n \l
>
> git version 1.7.9.5
>
> The pull trace still shows the error you noticed.
>
Should be fixed now. Thanks.
__
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 00:28 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 18 October 2013 21:28, Iain Brown Douglas
> wrote:
> >
> > Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the
> activity shared
> > and have someone join for it to work (?).
>
>
>
On 18 October 2013 21:28, Iain Brown Douglas wrote:
> >
> > Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the activity shared
> > and have someone join for it to work (?).
>
> No, it is not that, I have double checked.
> Chat does not throw a bubble into F1 view either.
>
Hmm would need furt
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:29 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender
> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for such a fast response.
> > == N/W ==
> > Chat opens, appears to start but cannot tx
...
>
> Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the
On 18 October 2013 18:29, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > Tuxpaint#log below
>>
>
> I guess this contains binaries compiled on another distribution or
> something. You would need to rebuild on F19 (or inside the sugar-build
> chroot anyway).
>
More precisely they seem to be built on a 32 bit m
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender wrote:
> > This is the trace when I ran
> > [osbuild sugar-build]$ check
>
Fixed.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender wrote:
> > == N/W ==
> > Chat opens, appears to start but cannot tx #log below
>
>
Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the activity shared and
have someone join for it to work (?).
> > == Fail to start ==
> >
> > MemoriseImportError
Actually it supports gtk2 activities too these days.
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender wrote:
> My understanding is that by default, the sugar build environment is
> not set up to support gtk2 activities or gst-0.10. This would perhaps
> account for most the errors you found. Cannot comme
My understanding is that by default, the sugar build environment is
not set up to support gtk2 activities or gst-0.10. This would perhaps
account for most the errors you found. Cannot comment of what seems to
be broken with web activities.
regards
-walter
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Iain Br
I tested sugar-build from
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html
on a PC running xubuntu. It installed fine, without reported error.
It runs nicely. Very impressed, *thank you all*.
I have a problem with a few Activities.
My guess is that the cause is that I am not working in GNOM
23 matches
Mail list logo
