Hello List
I'm trying to create an olpc image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5 with
some customization like (no gnome, new bootanim, adobe flash, extra
activities, etc...), but i have one problem, when i disable the option for
gnome desktop enviroment, the battery indicator is missing[0], i'm using the
Hi:
I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery
applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in
modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included.
Sounds like batti should be in a kspkglist file in modules/powered if
sugar needs thi
I really don't think batti is used by Sugar. Maybe something that batti
depended on was needed. German, check the logs?
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
On 2 August 2011 23:01, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery
> applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in
> modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included.
Batti isn't used by sugar, but
Daniel and list, upower was not included in the build, so, by adding this
package with:
[custom_packages]
add_packages=upower
the battery indicator is now back on sugar :)
Thanks...
2011/8/2 Daniel Drake
> On 2 August 2011 23:01, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I haven't tried to remove g
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, German Ruiz wrote:
> Daniel and list, upower was not included in the build, so, by adding this
> package with:
>
> [custom_packages]
> add_packages=upower
>
> the battery indicator is now back on sugar :)
>
>
Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requi
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
> > Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement.
>
> Looks like an issue with OLPC's forked sugar package, where this
> dependency isn't present. (the fork just remov
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement.
Looks like an issue with OLPC's forked sugar package, where this
dependency isn't present. (the fork just removes the keyboard and
software updater dialogs from Sugar, everythi
8 matches
Mail list logo
