Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-05-14 Thread Sebastian Silva
This is working exactly as predicted, sorry I took so long to try it. I'm seeing an annoying bug, when I copy something, the left frame's width grows somehow and hides the left ~10px of my screen for the rest of the session. Is there a workaround? Otherwise, it's beautiful! Sebastian Sebastian

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Try to create a file like this /usr/share/xsessions/sugar.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Sugar GenericName=Sugar Exec=/path/to/sugar-build/osbuild run sugar Type=Application Untested but in theory it should work... On 10 March 2014 15:26, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > El 10/03/14

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 10/03/14 05:50, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva > wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the la

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I had to fix this for another bug, I have not tested with use_broot=false but in theory we should be always using the virtualenv python now. On 10 March 2014 01:27, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it > doesn't work because we are not act

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: > >> It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if >> anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of >> analysis you have been doing, then it's very

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-10 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 04:41, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: > > Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory >> "./out/install/etc/gconf/" or it would fail to install >> > > Can I see the output? It seems like something we should fix. > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of analysis you have been doing, then it's very useful feedback, because it's likely to find bugs, as we ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory "./out/install/etc/gconf/" or it would fail to install Can I see the output? It seems like something we should fix. Sure, I reproduced it easy enough. Thanks for the feedback.

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it doesn't work because we are not activating it but just running the python executable in the virtualenv. So osbuild is using the virtualenv python, but the child processes are not. Now if I could remember why we are not activating

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread S. Daniel Francis
All Arch Linux users I met usually solve this problem when developing by using virtualenv. 2014-03-09 20:54 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez : > On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >> On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persi

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I see.. :/ Gonzalo On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> >>> Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use python3.3, my system's default, ins

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> >>> Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use >>> python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the >>> culprit, in >>> ./out/sandbox/install/lib/p

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use >> python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the >> culprit, in >> ./out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/build.py I >> replaced in

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > > Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use > python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the > culprit, in > ./out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/build.py I > replaced in line 190 one instance of "python" for "python2.7" a

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-09 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 9 March 2014 04:07, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Hello, > My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora > on a chroot was slow enough > that I decided to set *"use_broot":false* on *prefs.json* with the > intention of running the latest sugar natively. > > I face a few

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Sam Parkinson
n for sending it 3 times. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Sam Parkinson" > Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot > To: "Sebastian Silva" > Cc: > > > Hi, > > > > I don't th

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
: Forgot reply all. Sorry Sebastian for sending it 3 times. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Sam Parkinson" <mailto:sam.parkins...@gmail.com>> Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot To: "Sebastian Silva"

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Sam Parkinson
Forgot reply all. Sorry Sebastian for sending it 3 times. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Sam Parkinson" Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot To: "Sebastian Silva" Cc: > Hi, > > I don't thi

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 08/03/14 22:27, Gaurav Parida escribió: So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. +1 for adding it to the docs. Hi, No, i only have Archlinux on my m

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Gaurav Parida
So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. +1 for adding it to the docs. On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Thanks for the tips :) We sh

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Sam Parkinson
Thanks for the tips :) We should definitely put a link in the docs On Mar 9, 2014 2:07 PM, "Sebastian Silva" wrote: > Hello, > My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora > on a chroot was slow enough > that I decided to set *"use_broot":false* on *prefs.json* with

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

2014-03-08 Thread Sebastian Silva
Hello, My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora on a chroot was slow enough that I decided to set *"use_broot":false* on *prefs.json* with the intention of running the latest sugar natively. I face a few issues: First, /automake/ gave me some issues, it was re