On 2010.08.11 00:51:51 +, Will Andrews wrote:
Author: will
Date: Wed Aug 11 00:51:50 2010
New Revision: 211157
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211157
Log:
Allow carp(4) to be loaded as a kernel module. Follow precedent set by
bridge(4), lagg(4) etc. and make use of
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:51:51AM +, Will Andrews wrote:
Author: will
Date: Wed Aug 11 00:51:50 2010
New Revision: 211157
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211157
Log:
Allow carp(4) to be loaded as a kernel module. Follow precedent set by
bridge(4), lagg(4) etc. and
Will Andrews wrote:
Author: will
Date: Wed Aug 11 00:51:50 2010
New Revision: 211157
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211157
Log:
Allow carp(4) to be loaded as a kernel module. Follow precedent set by
bridge(4), lagg(4) etc. and make use of function pointers and
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:36 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
This doesn't compile due to duplicate function pointer definitions (e.g.
if_bridge.c and if_ether.c). You should move all the function pointer
definitions to net/if.c and add declarations for them to a header instead of
a
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Will Andrews wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to allow unload only if there are no carp(4)
interfaces? I'd be glad to destroy my carp interfaces before unloading
the module, but recompiling the kernel
Author: will
Date: Wed Aug 11 00:51:50 2010
New Revision: 211157
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211157
Log:
Allow carp(4) to be loaded as a kernel module. Follow precedent set by
bridge(4), lagg(4) etc. and make use of function pointers and
pf_proto_register() to hook carp into
