Heh. Actually, that's an interesting one. I never understood the
fascination with this particular package. It routinely sells on eBay
for anywhere between $100-$200, but it's really not that interesting...
For that price, you can probably grab 5 or 6 grey boxes, a couple of
folios, and some Inv
In a message dated 02/03/2004 10:44:53 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
routinely sells on eBay for anywhere between $100-$200, but it's really not that interesting
Well not interesting from a collector/trinket point of view maybe but nice to get all (well most) of the Infocom
In a message dated 02/03/2004 10:50:31 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I might list some of this seller's other prices here, it is so funny I could die laughing...
Hmm, well I won't be doing this, I wrote to her asking some questions, she seems very nice. Prices out
What site is it?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:26
PM
Subject: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
Awhile back there was a private web page selling
games for "ludicrous" prices but this seller is setti
> Stephane Racle schrieb:
>
> Heh. Actually, that's an interesting one. I never understood the
> fascination with this particular package. It routinely sells on eBay
> for anywhere between $100-$200, but it's really not that
> interesting... For that price, you can probably grab 5 or 6 grey
> boxe
reasonable. Feel free to use this method on your sites. No need to mention me as the source (please).
Hugh
-Original Message- From: BL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Feb 4, 2004 4:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
What site is it?
- Original M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
>
>This is really shameless. I suggest a standard for classic =
>game prices as follows:
>
>1994 - Present:
>Price = (number of letters in game name) x $10
>1986 - 93:
>Price = (number of letters in game name) x $20
>1977 - 85:
>Price = (number of letters in game name) x
al Message-
From: "Lee K. Seitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 4, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Software Collecting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
>
>This is really shameless. I suggest a standard for classic =
>game pric
ge-
From: "Lee K. Seitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 4, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Software Collecting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
This is really shameless. I suggest a standard for classic =
game prices as follows:
I wonder what the most valuable game of all time is with this new perfect
system? :)
Brad
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
> Lee,
>
> Than
15 PM
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
> I wonder what the most valuable game of all time is with this new perfect
> system? :)
>
> Brad
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, F
TED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004
4:39 PM
To: swcollect
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my
G*d
Let's validate the
system:
Ultima IX: Ascension is worth $80 + $9 - $90 = -$1, so $0. This must therefore
be be a good system!
Although I still like the -$1 value, because if I had to play
.
No seriously, please tell me to stop.
Hugh
-Original Message-
From: C.E. Forman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
Quite possibly...
"Leather Goddesses of Phobos 2: Gas Pump Girls
is thread, please tell me to stop.
No seriously, please tell me to stop.
Hugh
-Original Message-
From: C.E. Forman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
Quite possibly...
"Leather Goddesses
Hugh Falk wrote:
Regardless of how many sequels a game has, the final value of a game can
never be worth less than $0.
If a game was so terrible that the time it took to get through it would have
been better spent *any other way* -- say, eating lint -- then it can be worth
a negative value. Cy
For bad games, Braindead 13 comes to mind too. Does that count like a
sequel?
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Jim Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Oh my G*d
Hugh Falk wrote:
> Regardless
Stuart Feldhamer wrote:
For bad games, Braindead 13 comes to mind too. Does that count like a
sequel?
It wasn't technically a sequel. Of course, you could have been asking a
rhetorical question and I missed it :)
--
Jim Leonard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])http://www.oldskool.org/
Want
17 matches
Mail list logo
