Re: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 containsnewtext to address ietf last call comments (fwd)

2007-06-23 Thread Glenn M. Keeni
Rainer, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > Glenn, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Glenn M. Keeni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 2:45 AM >> To: tom.petch >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 >> containsnewtext to a

RE: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 containsnewtext to address ietf last call comments (fwd)

2007-06-23 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Glenn, > -Original Message- > From: Glenn M. Keeni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 2:45 AM > To: tom.petch > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 > containsnewtext to address ietf last call comments (fwd) > >

RE: [Syslog] -syslog-tc-mib Facilities

2007-06-23 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Glen, it is b). I think you are assuming way too much about severity. It's a field with only 24 different values. It is *not* something like an IP port. You cannot reliably say anything on reception of a specific facility. OK, LOG_KERN and LOG_MAIL are almost always what they claim to be. But I wo