---
src/journal/journal-file.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/journal-file.h b/src/journal/journal-file.h
index da2ef3b..6b4bf0d 100644
--- a/src/journal/journal-file.h
+++ b/src/journal/journal-file.h
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ typedef struct JournalFile {
---
Makefile.am | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 5312851..52f578b 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -2050,9 +2050,11 @@ endif
dist_factory_etc_DATA = \
factory/etc/nsswitch.conf
+if HAVE_PAM
dist_factory_pam_DATA = \
etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf can be static and
does not need to be generated anymore.
systemd.conf was doing all the journal setup, now this is moved to
systemd-journald.conf file.
systemd-remote.conf was re
move each user/group creation to a file that represents its own split
package, so it's possible to ship them in separate.
---
Makefile.am| 33 +++--
sysusers.d/systemd-journal-remote.conf | 9 +
sysusers.d/systemd-journal-upload.conf
---
Makefile.am | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 8a32880..62cf768 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -387,7 +387,6 @@ rootlibexec_PROGRAMS = \
systemd-ac-power \
systemd-sysctl \
systemd-sle
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:50PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
> moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf can be static and
> does not need to be generated anymore.
>
> systemd.conf was doing
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:26:38AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:50PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
> > moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf ca
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:26:38AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:50PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
> > moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf ca
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:26:31AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:51PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > move each user/group creation to a file that represents its own split
> > package, so it's possible to s
as we saw.
My only comment is that we should also remove:
-ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections
those are only useful to enable gc-sections.
From time to time someone should run a build with
-ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections
-Wl,--gc-sections
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:27:45PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2014-11-26 18:16 GMT+01:00 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> :
> >
> > My only comment is that we should also remove:
> > -ffunction-sections
> > -fdata-sections
> > those are only useful
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:33:31PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 26.11.14 15:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (gustavo.barbi...@intel.com)
> wrote:
>
> > I'm okay with the change to remove gc-sections.
> >
> > systemd is pretty good at not leaving crap i
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:42:37PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:33:31PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Wed, 26.11.14 15:16, Gustavo Sverzut Ba
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 06:50:19PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2014 13:42:27 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> I'm asking because from Peter Wu's email we're 26384
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:36:12PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
> > Currently configure.ac has the LTO logic inside an:
> >
> > AS_CASE([$CFLAGS], [*-O[[12345\ ]]*],
> >
&g
em at 7000! This is really weird, do you have
any way to debug it?
BR,
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
_
This patch adds a cpp definition HAVE_SYSV_COMPAT that is used to
isolate code dealing with /etc/init.d and /etc/rcN.d for systems where
it does not make sense (one that does not use sysv or one that is fully
systemd native).
The patch tries to be as little intrusive as possible, however in
order
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/9/8 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> - calling any of /etc/init.d scripts is bad, as it will call openrc
>> and it will bring all dependencies on its own, including services
>> managed by systemd that are up already.
FIG_DEVTMPFS=y in your kernel?
BTW, if this is always required now we should update README (and then
I can change my Gentoo ebuild to check for it)
BR,
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype
ported already.
Jack, did you check EnvironmentFile=/etc/conf.d/xyz?
if this file defines ABC=123, then you can use ExecStart=/path/to/app $ABC
AFAIK the first ExecStart must be a full path to the binary and cannot
come from envvars.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
ht
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Fabian Henze wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. September 2010, 06:30:14 schrieb Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri:
>> - calling any of /etc/init.d scripts is bad, as it will call openrc
>> and it will bring all dependencies on its own, including services
>> ma
of.
Moreover, this is free software and people are taking care of their
problems. Kay and Lennart focus on their stuff, we should help to fit
our needs... or wait a possibly endless loop: while
(!dreams_come_true()) complain(); :-)
For instance, I already submitted
powerful script that converts them to systemd units?
Many of scripts these days use start-stop-daemon and we could generate
matching units without much hassle.
Anyway, your runscript.sh will be useful if we aim at having systemd
as an official gentoo alternative.
BR,
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbi
---
src/util.c | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util.c b/src/util.c
index 0cd1fd3..ec3df94 100644
--- a/src/util.c
+++ b/src/util.c
@@ -2835,6 +2835,17 @@ void status_welcome(void) {
status_printf("Welcome to \x1B[0;32m%s\x1B[0m!\n"
=INIT_VERSION=sysvinit-1234
BR,
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
should make it work. If you don't need sysv init compatibility,
then check out the patch I've send... at least it will remove some
stat/open and avoid some checks you don't need.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded system
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> This patch adds a cpp definition HAVE_SYSV_COMPAT that is used to
> isolate code dealing with /etc/init.d and /etc/rcN.d for systems where
> it does not make sense (one that does not use sysv or one that is fully
> sy
This patch adds a cpp definition HAVE_SYSV_COMPAT that is used to
isolate code dealing with /etc/init.d and /etc/rcN.d for systems where
it does not make sense (one that does not use sysv or one that is fully
systemd native).
The patch tries to be as little intrusive as possible, however in
order
This patch isolates code using IPv6, AF_INET6 and in6 usage inside
'#ifdef HAVE_IPV6' blocks.
Some code assumed IPv6 and relied on its specific features, such as
binding to a specific interface by means of sin6_scope_id like in
socket-util.c:socket_address_parse(). Now a IPv4 solution is provided
g
> it to udev configuration.
yeah, my system did not work properly until i did that.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (1
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 16:36, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> This patch isolates code using IPv6, AF_INET6 and in6 usage inside
>> '#ifdef HAVE_IPV6' blocks.
>
> I think new projects from 2010 sh
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 16:36, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> This patch isolates code using IPv6, AF_INET6 and in6 usage inside
>&
kernel where IPv6 is disabled, but that should be
> all that it is doing.
Damn! and I was thinking about providing a connman build without ipv6... :-D
BTW, could you provide some connman.service in your next release?
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
---
bout providing a connman build without ipv6... :-D
>>
>> BTW, could you provide some connman.service in your next release?
>
> if you have done so already, please send a patch. We can clearly include
> these. I still have the BlueZ patches from Lennart on my todo list.
I have t
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 08.09.10 11:24, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Seems that sysvinit provides INIT_VERSION=sysvinit-1234 to its spawned
>> processes and tools lik
h mess of m4_ifdef() for such simple
tasks? These all provide work around for distribution specific
sysvinit tools... for instance the TARGET_GENTOO is wrong as we need
to define INIT_VERSION otherwise the tools do nothing and exit. :-/
what do you think of implementin
This patch introduces socket_ipv6_is_supported() call that checks for
IPv6 availability. Code then check for it before using specific calls.
In order to be less intrusive, this patch avoids IPv6 entries being
parsed at all, this way we don't get such entries in the system and
all other code paths
f the process are still there
or not, we could even log_debug("killing process %d (%s) with SIGKILL
as it remained after SIGTERM")
I can try to help there, but I don't want to do things in a way and
later people say it should be the other :-)
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://pro
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 08.09.10 20:14, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 08.09.10 11:24, Gustavo Sverz
o you? It is required to work.
Lennart, maybe we should make the kmod-setup take another flag "MUST"
and "OPTIONAL", do modprobe for each module in separate and fail if
"MUST" are not present? Right now it is confusing for users.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profu
This patch is a bit bigger than expected since Gentoo being
non-standard in some places.
1. it is installing binaries at /usr/bin instead of /bin.
2. it is using CamelCase names for consolefonts.
3. /etc/rc.conf:unicode=(yes|no) just forbids loadkeys and setfont
"-u" options, but do not d
Use locale variables from /etc/profile.env as Gentoo's openrc
runscript does (tool that is used by /etc/init.d/* services).
---
src/locale-setup.c | 26 ++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/locale-setup.c b/src/locale-setup.c
index 923be0
pulled... then I had to
manually "systemctl enable $MOUNTPOINT.service"...
- should we provide a "clean /tmp" service?
BR,
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
-
it may happen that parent directories of RANDOM_SEED do not exist, in
that case we must create it otherwise save will not work.
---
src/random-seed.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/random-seed.c b/src/random-seed.c
index 936ed47..2b3a61f 100644
-
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 14:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> - systemd-modules-load.service: why do we need this as a separated
>> service?
>
> What else would it be?
built-in systemd, just like locale setup
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:16:10AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> while at it:
>> - do we really need to install 6 getty services by default? can't we
>> just install one and people that don'
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:13:20AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> Maybe integrate it into systemd? It's one single .c file as far as I
>> could check.
>
> What's the advantage of making this monoli
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 19.09.10 21:23, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
> Looks pretty good, but a few requests:
>
>> +#ifdef TARGET_GENTOO
>> +/* Gentoo uses sys-apps/kbd that i
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 19.09.10 21:32, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
>> Use locale variables from /etc/profile.env as Gentoo's openrc
>> runscript does (tool that is used by /
This patch is a bit bigger than expected since Gentoo being
non-standard in some places.
1. it is installing binaries at /usr/bin instead of /bin.
2. it is using CamelCase names for consolefonts.
3. /etc/rc.conf:unicode=(yes|no) just forbids loadkeys and setfont
"-u" options, but do not d
reduce
the number of ifdefs.
Lennart's suggestions were fixed and squashed with the original patch,
that was sent by Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi).
---
configure.ac| 17 ++--
src/build.h |8 +++-
src/dbus-manager.c | 49 ++-
---
Makefile.am | 16 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index b5b2a9d..3c3fa3b 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -183,7 +183,9 @@ dist_systemunit_DATA = \
units/remount-rootfs.service \
units/prin
icient
that all the replication done in plymouth BTW).
The project contains a very simple ad-hoc makefile, after I have some
more code I will add autoconf to it. Any input and patches are
appreciated.
Lennart: do you mind adding a simple property NFailedJobs? It would be
very helpful :-)
BR,
--
/lib/systemd/ or
/lib/systemd/scripts, not inside /lib/systemd/system. The rationale is
that the current systemd applications are kept at /lib/systemd itself.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> 1;2591;0cOn Tue, 21.09.10 23:39, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> (barbi...@profusion.mobi) wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've wrote a proof of concept of a simple boot status for systemd.
>> Yeah, I kn
ot;Not preloading file %s with size out of bounds
> %lli", fn, (unsigned long long) st->st_size);
unsigned long long = llu, not lli.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@g
Reduce number of exported symbols with -fvisibility=hidden by default,
this is safe as we're not generating and loadable library and our
binaries should have no exported symbol other than main(). This alone
reduces around 4kb per binary.
It will also request GCC to emit every function and data var
init, but post
manager_loop(). Being pid1 we can use kill(-1), wait() will work for
every process, etc.
if we need things like UPS, better to make that uniform and always
call it if present.
BR,
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
Anyway, if you have some ideas about the design, other than minor
details to make it work being execv() from main.c if (getpid() == 1)
(in the place of freeze()).
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
S
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions are working as follows:
- Send a SIGTERM to all process
- Send a SIGKILL to all process
- Try to umount all mount points
- Try to remount read-only all mount points that can't
be umounted
- Call shutdown
If one step fail, shutdown
---
Makefile.am |1 +
src/main.c| 39 ++-
src/manager.h |3 +++
src/target.c |8
4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 4d8e181..bf9d9ab 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefil
---
units/halt.target |2 --
units/hwclock-save.service|2 +-
units/poweroff.target |2 --
units/reboot.target |2 --
units/systemd-random-seed-save.service.in |2 +-
units/sys
---
Makefile.am |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index bf9d9ab..04e4ad9 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -291,10 +291,6 @@ endif
if TARGET_GENTOO
dist_systemunit_DATA += \
- units/gentoo/halt.service \
-
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> From: Fabiano Fidencio
>
> This functions are working as follows:
> - Send a SIGTERM to all process
> - Send a SIGKILL to all process
> - Try to umount all mount points
> - Try to remount read-
I'm replying to this as couple of the bad ideas were my fault :-)
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 01.10.10 02:28, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>> From: Fabiano Fidencio
>>
>> This
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/10/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> From: Fabiano Fidencio
>>
>> This functions are working as follows:
>> - Send a SIGTERM to all process
>> - Send a SIGKILL to all process
>> - Try to
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 01.10.10 02:28, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>> +++ b/src/target.c
>> @@ -172,6 +172,14 @@ static int target_start(Unit *u) {
>> ass
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/10/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> 2010/10/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>>>> From: Fabiano Fidencio
>>>>
>>>> This functio
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 01.10.10 11:44, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 01.10.10 02:28, Gustavo Sverz
t offer
>> the necessary flexibility.
>
> As mentioned, Fabianos code is intended as last resort. The proper order
> in which to shut down stuff should be ensured with with the usual
> brefore/after dependencies.
yes!
Just one thing: do we still need a killall.service? Or
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 01.10.10 13:53, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>> > As mentioned, Fabianos code is intended as last resort. The proper order
>> > in which to shut down stuff should be
if (k == EOF)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + free(dev);
>> + return -EBADMSG;
>
> Please just "continue" in this error case, too, much like you handle
> mountinfo.
Yes, I've ask
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions will:
- umount all mount points that aren't API
- remount read-only all mount points that can't be umounted
- umount all swap devices.
- detach all loopback devices
TODO:
- umount dms
Mountpoints are being read from /proc/self/mountinfo.
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions are working as follows:
- Send a SIGTERM to all processes that may be finished
- Send a SIGKILL to all processes that still live and may be finished
- Try to unmount all mount points
- Try to remount read-only all mount points that can't be um
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions will:
- umount all mount points that aren't API
- remount read-only all mount points that can't be umounted
- umount all swap devices.
- detach all loopback devices
TODO:
- umount dms
Mountpoints are being read from /proc/self/mountinfo.
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions are working as follows:
- Send a SIGTERM to all processes that may be finished
- Send a SIGKILL to all processes that still live and may be finished
- Try to unmount all mount points
- Try to remount read-only all mount points that can't be um
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> From: Fabiano Fidencio
>
> This functions are working as follows:
> - Send a SIGTERM to all processes that may be finished
> - Send a SIGKILL to all processes that still live and may be finished
> -
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> From: Fabiano Fidencio
>
> This functions will:
> - umount all mount points that aren't API
> - remount read-only all mount points that can't be umounted
> - umount all swap devices.
>
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 06.10.10 02:05, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (barbi...@profusion.mobi)
> wrote:
>
>> +#define LOOP_CLR_FD 0x4C01
>
> Is there any particular reason you define this here? To me it appears
> that linux/lo
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
>>> + ioctl(fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0);
>>> + r = errno;
>>> + close_nointr(fd);
>>> +
>>> + if (r == ENXIO) /* not bound, so no error */
>>> +
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions will:
- umount all mount points that aren't API
- remount read-only all mount points that can't be umounted
- umount all swap devices.
- detach all loopback devices
TODO:
- umount dms
Mountpoints are being read from /proc/self/mountinfo.
From: Fabiano Fidencio
This functions are working as follows:
- Send a SIGTERM to all processes that may be finished
- Send a SIGKILL to all processes that still live and may be finished
- Try to unmount all mount points
- Try to remount read-only all mount points that can't be um
>
> I think, here you can let libudev return only the loop devices with:
> udev_enumerate_add_match_sysname(, "loop*");
and the snprintf() is totally useless, the strstr case should be early
continue "if (!strstr(..)) cont
ard places now!
>
> I totally agree. I think this serves as a start point to people
> starting migrating their init. If / when Arch developers decide to
> totally migrate to systemd, I hope these patches can be dropped.
I agree, but I've asked Gentoo developers and they said
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
From 9e3f451fd0a2fc7b15cca2078dc2d376e770de23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Date: Tue, 19 Oct
if (streq(mp->path, "/"))
> + continue;
> ^ add failed++ to make sure / is remounted-ro?
it would be a bit misleading.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
---
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Together with fidencio I tracked down the bug which caused / *not* to
>>> be remounted ro on shutdown.
>>
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> 2010/10/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
et it to 300).
I have a "live" (from git) systemd ebuild, with instructions I'm collecting at:
http://barbieri-playground.googlecode.com/svn/gentoo/overlay/sys-apps/systemd/README.txt
As for shutdown, yeah, it's as fast as it should be ;-) We're do
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 13:27, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
>> It boots into my Enlightenment17 with pid around 500,
>> with a hack to ignore some acpid udev modprobes I can get it to 300).
>
> Yeah,
.read() that
maps directly to C calls. I'm pretty sure there are similar things for
sockets/sendmsg/readmsg.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
__
> And another one; sometimes when I wake up after a suspend, the system
> goes to the BIOS screen and a normal boot, instead of bringing back
> the suspended system.
>
> Except those two problems, everything is working fine.
No idea, those do not happen to me.
--
Gustavo Sver
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 02:15:02PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s
>> wrote:
>> > Hi; I just wanted to give an update on the status of my system running
>
Of course I did forget the attached file in previous
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 02:15:02PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:34
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First, I'm not typing much or send the kernel oops since I'm at a
> phone without access to my lap ATM
>
> So yesterday I got my new laptop with quad core i7 and SSD. gentoo's
> ope
o be mounted serially and forcefully? This
would be helpful for buggy FS while you can't get the fix (or to
install and apply the fix -- as I'm using openrc but in future I'll
not)
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 10, 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First, I'm not typing much or send the kernel oops since I'm at a
>> phone without access to my lap AT
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:02:51PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, November 10, 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
&
On Thursday, November 11, 2010, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:52:51 -0200
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:02:51PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> >
See attached patch.
Another option is to just have dbus-glib-1 inside the PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTK...)
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
From
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
