Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.14 release schedule

2012-11-03 Thread anonym
09/10/12 02:07, anonym wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the release schedule for Tails 0.14, that was agreed on in the > thread "Next release: process, schedule and iceweasel backports": > > October 9th: 0.14 freeze + release of RC1. > October 23th: ESR backport is (hopefully) available. > October 25th:

[Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/remove-pdnsd

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, here's a candidate for 0.15. ticket: https://tails.boum.org/todo/replace_or_drop_pdnsd__63__/ branch: feature/remove-pdnsd ff295d8 Remove dangling symlink. fe074f8 Update design document to match pdnsd removal. 1eddaf3 Do not use pdnsd anymore. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https:

Re: [Tails-dev] Progress report on the automated test suite

2012-11-03 Thread Ague Mill
anonym: > I'd like to start by saying that I think the work bertagaz did on the > jruby + sikuli + cucumber combo is really great. He called it PoC, but > after having worked on it for some time now I say it's definitely fit > for the task at hand. Great. :) > Next I'd like to announce that the

[Tails-dev] Please test and "merge" feature-torbrowser APT suite

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, nothing new in Git on this front, so this is a pure APT merge request: $ reprepro ls iceweasel iceweasel | 10.0.9esr-1+tails1 | devel | i386, source iceweasel | 10.0.10esr-1+tails1 | experimental | i386, source

[Tails-dev] Please review and merge bugfix/no-console-setup-on-X

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, I've been fed up enough with being asked to "Press enter to activate this console" when entering a root shell in a GNOME Terminal to come up with this quick fix, eventually. Candidate for 0.15. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc

Re: [Tails-dev] Switch to Privoxy?

2012-11-03 Thread adrelanos
intrigeri: > hi, > > adrelanos wrote (02 Nov 2012 23:04:33 GMT) : >> Just a small test result. I saw the old thread where you weren't >> sure if the "can only download max. 64 MB big files through polipo" >> bug was actually fixed. > >> I downloaded the whole 769 MB (tails iso) through polipo (De

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.15 release schedule

2012-11-03 Thread Ague Mill
intrigeri: > FWIW, I'm trying to get this in 0.15 too: > [...] My personal goals: * Even if the memwipe seems way better now, I'd like another shot on feature/hugetlb_mem_wipe as the user experience is better with a progress bar. I'll need help for the tests. * Empty chroot/local_packages

Re: [Tails-dev] Switch to Privoxy?

2012-11-03 Thread Ague Mill
adrelanos: > > APT: a rough initial test was done, that added a tor+http shim in > /usr/lib/apt/methods IIRC, to add torsocks in the loop. It worked fairly > well, but one of the late live-build scripts insists on running APT, > which fails in this configuration. > > Now that torsocks is unmaintai

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/obfsproxy

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (02 Nov 2012 20:26:34 GMT) : > Ticket: https://tails.boum.org/todo/obfsproxy/ (WAN here) Please update the ticket tags to match the next things to do. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Re: [Tails-dev] Switch to Privoxy?

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
adrelanos wrote (02 Nov 2012 19:45:16 GMT) : > Perhaps paying someone for: > add http proxy support to Tor > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6060 > would be a clean solution. With my Tails developer hat on, I'd much rather see proper SOCKS support added to the few applications we n

Re: [Tails-dev] Progress report on the automated test suite

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (02 Nov 2012 16:42:31 GMT) : > I'd like to start by saying that I think the work bertagaz did on > the jruby + sikuli + cucumber combo is really great. He called it > PoC, but after having worked on it for some time now I say it's > definitely fit for the task at hand. Great! >

Re: [Tails-dev] Switch to Privoxy?

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, adrelanos wrote (02 Nov 2012 23:04:33 GMT) : > Just a small test result. I saw the old thread where you weren't > sure if the "can only download max. 64 MB big files through polipo" > bug was actually fixed. > I downloaded the whole 769 MB (tails iso) through polipo (Debian > wheezy standard

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/obfsproxy

2012-11-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (02 Nov 2012 20:26:34 GMT) : > Basic (perhaps even experimental as it currently lacks documentation) > support for obfsproxy has been added in the branch feature/obfsproxy. > Please review and merge it into devel. We agreed at the Tails summit to not merge new features before the