est option to me.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:08:04 +0000
Minoru wrote:
> Thanks Thomas White. I also remembered one more:
> 56ckl5obj37gypcu.onion. That makes five Electrum servers that can be
> accessed by a Tor hidden service. Jurre, do you think that we could
> add this “feature” to
/roadmap#Tails_1.4]?
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:52:52 +
Minoru wrote:
> Jurre,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. Technically, this is more of a feature
> than a bug. I actually emailed the Tails-bugs email address about the
> Electrum SPV vulnerability and they said that they l
would love to help Tails. That is why I have been emailing
about Electrum. However, I can only contribute “documentation” about
how bitcoin works and propose solutions to problems. Someone else would
need to write the code.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:37:10 +
Minoru wrote:
> I was able to find th
,
Minoru
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
sajolida,
“Right, that's what I understood as well. The proper solution for this
problem would then be to have a bunch of Electrum servers running behind
hidden services and included in the default pool.”
“But I've not seen that topic raised on the Electrum bug tracker.
Minoru, do you
three sections of
documentation that I proposed writing. I wanted your approval before I
started working on it to meet the 1.3.1 release.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:31:06 +
Minoru wrote:
> sajolida,
>
> I agree with your changes so far. The reason for the specific
> explanation is t
rious vulnerability
that needs a little more documentation to help users avoid the negative
effects of DoS.
Cheers,
Minoru
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty ema
centralized services.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:58:36 +
Minoru wrote:
> The article is attached to this email, but you can also find it at
> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.6079v2.pdf.
>
> I found an article by Alex Biryukov and Ivan Pustogarov that points
> out how easy it would b
liar with Electrum's implementation of
deterministic wallets, so I cannot reference specifics. Electrum
delayed implementing the standard of hierarchical deterministic wallets
(BIP 32) until version 2.0, but I am sure that it is similar.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:58:54 +
sajolida wrote:
> Mino
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:19:43 +
From: Minoru
To: intrigeri
Subject: Re: [Tails-dev] Electrum doc wrt. SPV security
Intrigeri,
Here is what I would write in the Electrum documentation:
"Do not blindly trust the bitcoin balance that Electrum displays.
Ele
I want to contribute to the Tails documentation and I was redirected
to you.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:29:12 +0100
From: tails-b...@boum.org
To: min...@riseup.net
Subject: Re:
Hi,
First, thanks for your input.
Actually, we have little time to dedicate to user
suppor
11 matches
Mail list logo
