Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (13 May 2014 09:47:45 GMT) : > * It would be good to have #6562 at least partly resolved in 1.1. > [...] I think that's the main blocker, but given it's "only" > documentation, I think it's fine if I do it only post-RC, and > can anyway be improved after 1.1 is ou

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (13 May 2014 09:47:45 GMT) : > If the release manager agrees with this course of action, then I'll > update the set of UEFI tickets accordingly, either later today (if > I get a super-quick answer), or on May 24. Tickets updated. #5739 now tracks the part that we want to have into

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread anonym
13/05/14 15:17, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (13 May 2014 12:42:35 GMT) : and --git-no-pristine-tar doesn't help (and ../liveusb-creator_3.11.6.orig.tar.gz exists) >>> >>> FTR, we don't use pristine-tar for this package. > >> I just did what the building instructions said one sh

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (13 May 2014 12:42:35 GMT) : >>>and --git-no-pristine-tar doesn't help (and >>>../liveusb-creator_3.11.6.orig.tar.gz exists) >> >> FTR, we don't use pristine-tar for this package. > I just did what the building instructions said one should do when > there's an issue with upst

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread anonym
13/05/14 13:58, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (13 May 2014 11:23:56 GMT) : >> As the RM, I agree with all this. [...] I trust you'll deal with the >> rest in time for the release. > > Thanks a lot. > >> I'd like to start merging now (for the "super-quick" resolution), but I >> have issues build

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (13 May 2014 11:23:56 GMT) : > As the RM, I agree with all this. [...] I trust you'll deal with the > rest in time for the release. Thanks a lot. > I'd like to start merging now (for the "super-quick" resolution), but I > have issues building liveusb-creator, after it being adapted f

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread anonym
13/05/14 11:47, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > The results of our UEFI call for testing are very good: > >https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/UEFI/syslinux/ > > ... and the release after 1.1 will likely be a point-release, so I'd > like us to ship UEFI support, at least as a "technology preview", i

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (13 May 2014 09:47:45 GMT) : > 1. merge feature/uefi in its current state; I forgot to mention than this requires: * a merge in the Tails main Git repo * a merge in the liveusb-creator Git repo * an APT merge * ideally, a new release of liveusb-creator, to replace the snapshot f

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.1] feature/uefi (#5739)

2014-05-13 Thread intrigeri
Hi, The results of our UEFI call for testing are very good: https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/UEFI/syslinux/ ... and the release after 1.1 will likely be a point-release, so I'd like us to ship UEFI support, at least as a "technology preview", in Tails 1.1. Else, this will have to wait for the