Hi Alan,
intrigeri wrote (01 Jul 2015 12:32:49 GMT) :
> Alan wrote (18 Mar 2015 21:20:02 GMT) :
>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:29:55 +0100
>> intrigeri wrote:
>>> sajolida wrote (15 Mar 2015 19:46:47 GMT) :
>>> >> I'm personally undecided wrt. which one of these two is the best.
>>>
>>> > Neither am
Alan wrote (18 Mar 2015 21:20:02 GMT) :
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:29:55 +0100
> intrigeri wrote:
>> sajolida wrote (15 Mar 2015 19:46:47 GMT) :
>> >> I'm personally undecided wrt. which one of these two is the best.
>>
>> > Neither am I :)
>>
>> Then I'm all for "those who do the work decide" — i
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:29:55 +0100
intrigeri wrote:
> sajolida wrote (15 Mar 2015 19:46:47 GMT) :
> >> I'm personally undecided wrt. which one of these two is the best.
>
> > Neither am I :)
>
> Then I'm all for "those who do the work decide" — in this case, that
> would be Alan.
>
Then th
sajolida wrote (15 Mar 2015 19:46:47 GMT) :
>> I'm personally undecided wrt. which one of these two is the best.
> Neither am I :)
Then I'm all for "those who do the work decide" — in this case, that
would be Alan.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev m
intrigeri:
> sajolida wrote (10 Mar 2015 14:40:44 GMT) :
>> 1. Clicking on the green onion opens a popup (like for Florence) with
>> the list of circuits. That would be the most integrated solution but
>> depends on the information in that popup to be dense enough. On your
>> current screenshot for
Hi,
sajolida wrote (10 Mar 2015 14:40:44 GMT) :
> intrigeri:
>> Alan wrote (06 Mar 2015 21:12:43 GMT) :
>>> sajolida wrote:
I hereby propose to have the list of circuits accessible directly from
the green onion as it is the case now in Vidalia. But I'm not sure how
this fits with y
Hi,
sajolida wrote:
> intrigeri:
> > Alan wrote (06 Mar 2015 21:12:43 GMT) :
> >> sajolida wrote:
> >>> I hereby propose to have the list of circuits accessible directly from
> >>> the green onion as it is the case now in Vidalia. But I'm not sure how
> >>> this fits with your architectural pla
intrigeri:
> Alan wrote (06 Mar 2015 21:12:43 GMT) :
>> sajolida wrote:
>>> I hereby propose to have the list of circuits accessible directly from
>>> the green onion as it is the case now in Vidalia. But I'm not sure how
>>> this fits with your architectural plans and related security implication
hi,
Alan wrote (06 Mar 2015 21:12:43 GMT) :
> sajolida wrote:
>> I hereby propose to have the list of circuits accessible directly from
>> the green onion as it is the case now in Vidalia. But I'm not sure how
>> this fits with your architectural plans and related security implications.
I'm not
Hi,
sajolida wrote:
> Following-up on the ideas of:
>
> - Keeping the green onion as a permanent visual feedback on the desktop.
> - Not breaking too much of what people have been used to unless we
> have a good (UX) reason to do so (keeping what works in Vidalia).
> - Integrating Tor Monitor
Alan:
> intrigeri wrote:
>> Alan wrote (20 Feb 2015 19:43:10 GMT) :
>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:23:03 +
>>> sajolida wrote:
intrigeri:
> sajolida wrote (18 Feb 2015 11:32:17 GMT) :
>> intrigeri:
>>> [About the green onion]
>>
>> but would it be conceivable to have Tor Monitor
Hi,
Alan wrote (01 Mar 2015 18:26:28 GMT) :
> Here is a diagram on what I though for more privilege separation:
> control socket
> Tor <> TorMonitorD
> ^
> debian-tor user |
> .DBus.
Hi,
Some precisions on my last email below.
Alan wrote:
> intrigeri wrote:
> > I can imagine that we have a totally separate backend that monitors
> > Tor's connectivity status
>
> Please note that I'm not aware of such a concept of "connectivity
> status" in Tor. If you know about it, don't h
Hi!
intrigeri wrote:
> Alan wrote (20 Feb 2015 19:43:10 GMT) :
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:23:03 +
> > sajolida wrote:
> >> intrigeri:
> >> > sajolida wrote (18 Feb 2015 11:32:17 GMT) :
> >> >> intrigeri:
> > [About the green onion]
>
> >> >> but would it be conceivable to have Tor Monitor
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
