05/23/2012 04:18 PM, intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> The design draft has been significantly reworked since then.
> A security discussion was written. Please review.
I have reviewed the complete draft. I completely buy your argument
regarding its security guarantees:
We believe the update system descri
Hi,
The design draft has been significantly reworked since then.
A security discussion was written. Please review.
See bellow answers to the questions and remarks Robert sent us
a while ago.
Robert Ransom wrote (02 May 2012 17:27:12 GMT) :
> *Everything* which the update downloader needs to auth
Robert Ransom wrote (02 May 2012 17:27:12 GMT) :
> Have you read the Thandy spec
Too long ago, apparently.
> and the TUF paper?
Do you mean https://www.updateframework.com/ ?
If so, not yet. Thanks for the reference.
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-de
On 5/2/12, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please review
> https://tails.boum.org/todo/incremental_upgrades/
>
> I'm particularly interested in:
>
> * your thoughts about the general idea and process as described
> there
*Everything* which the update downloader needs to authenticate must be
in t
Hi,
please review
https://tails.boum.org/todo/incremental_upgrades/
I'm particularly interested in:
* your thoughts about the general idea and process as described
there
* questions to refine the idea, the requirements, whatever
difficulty I may have missed...
* your thoughts abo
