Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] OSM User Testing

is interested: http://vimeo.com/15015261 On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:54 AM, SteveC wrote: > sounds like you should join us in SF! > > On Sep 30, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Peter Batty wrote: > > > I think it's great that something is being done on this. > > > > Personall

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] OSM User Testing

I think it's great that something is being done on this. Personally I would suggest finding a few volunteers to be tested and sit in a room with them. You don't need a lot of people to find the key issues and I think you get more from seeing them do it in person and having them "think out loud" ra

Re: [OSM-talk] [Geowanking] closedstreetmap.org

And perhaps also private organizations that will take your data but not let you have it back :) ? Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2010, at 5:51 AM, Andrew Turner wrote: > Perhaps it would be useful to maintain a (shrinking) list of Publicly > funded organizations that don't reciprocally share

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Addressing Question

This may be stating the obvious, but it's a lot less effort to capture address ranges for each block than to capture an accurate location for each individual building. I think that's the primary reason why most geocoding systems use this approach. But it's not either / or - if you're doing geocodin