On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
* WHAT changes can be made to the license once it is accepted;
If section 11 of the GDFL 3.1 is anything to go by [1], then pretty much
anything is possible.
This clause was specifically engineered to permit Wikipedia
Frederik Ramm wrote:
* WHAT changes can be made to the license once it is accepted;
* WHO can make these changes (whom do we trust to make them); and
* HOW will such changes become vetted by the community, if at all.
These are the decisions that can absolutely not be postponed until after
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:59:26PM +, 80n wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
* WHAT changes can be made to the license once it is accepted;
If section 11 of the GDFL 3.1 is anything to go by [1], then pretty much
anything is possible.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:41:06AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
* WHAT changes can be made to the license once it is accepted;
I think this should be limited to avoid overstepping. We define the
basic things we want the licence to do—collective attribution, share
alike for derived data sets,
4 matches
Mail list logo
