Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building

2009-10-26 Thread Joseph Reeves
Tenant? As per the message title? 2009/10/26 MP : >> >Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name >> >isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. >> >> >> Perhaps 'name', 'user' and 'owner' in that order? > > Tag 'user' was misused few times by som

Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building

2009-10-26 Thread MP
> >Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name > >isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. > > > Perhaps 'name', 'user' and 'owner' in that order? Tag 'user' was misused few times by some editors in the past to contain name of user who made the e

Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building

2009-10-26 Thread Ed Avis
Peter Körner mazdermind.de> writes: >Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name >isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. Perhaps 'name', 'user' and 'owner' in that order? -- Ed Avis ___ talk mai

Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building

2009-10-26 Thread Peter Körner
> > Is there a convention for disentangling these things? > Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. If you tell this we can male a patch to the rendering stylesheet and post it on dev and maybe it wi

[OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building

2009-10-26 Thread Ed Avis
Building 38446590 is shown in the centre of this map: There are several pieces of information which might be rendered on the map, or included in name searches: - The building is called 116, Pall Mall; it has no na