Re: [talk-au] mapping marsh at the edge of a bay

2010-12-21 Thread info
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M >> >> Along the edge of the bay/water there is >> >> land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water >>  A                  B                C >> >> In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657 >> I m

Re: [talk-au] mapping marsh at the edge of a bay

2010-12-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: > For example, > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M > > Along the edge of the bay/water there is > > land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water >  A                  B                C > > In the chang

Re: [talk-au] Does this mean?.....

2010-12-21 Thread Ian Sergeant
I wrote : > And even non-artistic photography... [is copyrightable] > > However, this case draws a real distinction between the human process > of originality, and an automated process according to a set of rules. > > I've no doubt that if I take a photo out of an aeroplane window that > copyright

[talk-au] mapping marsh at the edge of a bay

2010-12-21 Thread Andrew Harvey
For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M Along the edge of the bay/water there is land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water A BC In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657 I moved the

Re: [talk-au] Does this mean?.....

2010-12-21 Thread Richard Colless
On 21/12/2010 2:04 PM, Ian Sergeant wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Nick Hocking wrote: Since taking a photo of something entails little or no "independent intellectual effort", On 21 December 2010 13:08, Steve Bennett wrot