>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M
>>
>> Along the edge of the bay/water there is
>>
>> land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water
>> A B C
>>
>> In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657
>> I m
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> For example,
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> Along the edge of the bay/water there is
>
> land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water
> A B C
>
> In the chang
I wrote :
> And even non-artistic photography... [is copyrightable]
>
> However, this case draws a real distinction between the human process
> of originality, and an automated process according to a set of rules.
>
> I've no doubt that if I take a photo out of an aeroplane window that
> copyright
For example,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M
Along the edge of the bay/water there is
land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water
A BC
In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657
I moved the
On 21/12/2010 2:04 PM, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Since taking a photo of something entails little or no "independent
intellectual effort",
On 21 December 2010 13:08, Steve Bennett wrot
5 matches
Mail list logo